Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 2. Ming and Ch'ing PorcelainHobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
History
Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 2. Ming and Ch'ing Porcelain
Hobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
Porcelain, Chinese; Pottery, Chinese
Many other modifications appear in the porcelain of the first half of
the eighteenth century. There is, for instance, a very dead white ware,
soft looking, but translucent, which occurs on some of the choicer
examples of armorial porcelain.[373] There are several specimens of
this in the British Museum, one of which bears the early date, 1702,
while others belong to the Yung Chêng period. Again there is the highly
vitreous ware evolved by T’ang Ying to imitate the opaque glass of
_Ku-yüeh-hsüan_; but that will be discussed later.[374] These
special bodies were mainly employed for articles of small size and
ornamental design, and they can be studied in all their varieties in
a representative collection of snuff bottles. The Chinese potters
lavished all their skill on these dainty little objects. Not only
do they include every kind of ware, crackled or plain, translucent
or opaque, but they illustrate in miniature every variety of
decoration--monochrome, painted, carved, moulded, incised, pierced and
embossed. Probably the choicest snuff bottles were made in the Yung
Chêng and Ch’ien Lung periods; but the Chinese have never ceased to
delight in them, and many beautiful examples were manufactured in the
nineteenth century, particularly in the Tao Kuang period.
The ordinary Yung Chêng porcelain differs but little from that of the
previous reign, though it tends to assume a whiter appearance, and
the green tinge of the glaze is less marked. Moreover, a change is
noticeable in the finish of the base rim of vases and bowls. Bevelling
of the edge is less common, and gives place to a rounded or angular
finish, the foot rim being often almost [symbol: V]-shaped; while the
slight tinge of brown around the raw edge, which is usual on K’ang Hsi
wares, is often entirely absent. The actual potting of the porcelain
displays a wonderful degree of manipulative skill, and the forms,
though highly finished, are not lacking in vigour. They are, in fact,
a happy mean between the strong, free lines of the K’ang Hsi and the
meticulous finish of the later Ch’ien Lung porcelains. The verdict of
the _T’ao lu_, “extremely refined and elegant,” is fully justified
by the porcelain itself no less than by its decoration.
Not the least deserving of this praise, though mainly made for export,
is the important group discussed on page 209, viz. the saucer dishes,
plates, tea and coffee wares, etc., of delicate white porcelain,
painted, apparently at Canton, in the _famille rose_ enamels. It
is an “eggshell” porcelain, white, thin, and beautifully finished,
and the dainty little conical or bell-shaped tea cups, though without
handles, are the perfection of table ware. This kind of “eggshell” is
easily distinguished from the Ming type, which is greener in tone and
has the appearance of melting snow by transmitted light.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account