Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 2. Ming and Ch'ing PorcelainHobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
History
Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 2. Ming and Ch'ing Porcelain
Hobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
Porcelain, Chinese; Pottery, Chinese
From this cumulative evidence it is clear that the manufacture of
eggshell dishes and services with _famille rose_ enamels in the
Canton style and with “ruby backs” was in full swing in the Yung Chêng
period, and the general tendency to label them all Ch’ien Lung errs on
the side of excessive caution.
Passing from this particular group, which was affected by special
influences, the general character of the Yung Chêng enamelled
decoration is one of great refinement in design and execution. The
over-elaboration and the overcrowding which are observable on the later
Ch’ien Lung _famille rose_ are absent at this period. The tendency
was on the contrary towards elegant and restrained effects, such as a
flowering spray thrown artistically across the field, birds on a bough
and other graceful designs which left plenty of scope for the fine
quality of the white background. It is this nicely balanced decoration
coupled with the delicacy of the painting and the beautiful finish of
the porcelain itself, which gives the Yung Chêng enamelled wares their
singular distinction and charm.
There are still a few special types of painted wares to be noticed
before passing to the monochromes. One of these is named in the
Imperial list,[401] under the heading “Porcelain painted in ink
(_ts’ai shui mo_),” a figurative expression, for Indian ink could
not stand the heat even of the enamelling kiln, and could never have
served as a true ceramic pigment. The material used was a dry black or
brown black pigment derived from manganese, and closely allied to the
pigment which had long served in a subordinate position for tracing
outlines. Evidently this material was now greatly improved, and could
be used for complete designs which resembled drawings in Indian ink or
in sepia. It is certain, however, that the Chinese, whose methods were
necessarily empirical, had first experimented with actual ink, for Père
d’Entrecolles wrote in 1722[402]--“an attempt made to paint in black
some vases with the finest Chinese ink met with no success. When the
porcelain had been fired, it turned out white. The particles of this
black had not sufficient body, and were dissipated by the action of the
fire; or rather they had not the strength to penetrate the layer of
glaze or to produce a colour differing from the plain glaze.” Between
that date and about 1730 when the Imperial list was drawn up, the
secret of the proper pigment seems to have been mastered, and we find
the black designs effectively used on Yung Chêng eggshell and other
wares, alone or brightened by a little gilding. Among other uses it was
found to be admirably suited for copying the effect of European prints
and line engravings, a _tour de force_ in which the proverbial
patience and imitative skill of the Chinese are well exemplified.
Another effect sometimes mistaken for black painting is produced by
silvered designs which become rapidly discoloured; but it is generally
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account