Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 2. Ming and Ch'ing PorcelainHobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
History
Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 2. Ming and Ch'ing Porcelain
Hobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
Porcelain, Chinese; Pottery, Chinese
With their intense veneration for the antique, it is only natural
that the Chinese should excel in imitative work, and a great deal
of ingenuity has been quite legitimately exercised by them in this
direction. The amateur will sometimes have difficulty in distinguishing
the clever copies from the originals, but in most cases the material
and the finish of the work frankly belong to a later period, and
sometimes all doubt is removed at once by a mark indicating the true
period of manufacture. But the collector has to be on his guard against
a very different kind of article, the spurious antique and the old
piece which has been “improved” by the addition of more elaborate
decoration or by an inscription which, if genuine, would give it
historic importance. The latter kind of embellishment is specially
common on the early potteries of the Han and T’ang periods. Genuine
specimens taken from excavated tombs have often been furnished with
dates and dedicatory legends cut into the body of the ware and then
doctored, to give the appearance of contemporary incisions. But a
careful examination of the edges of the channelled lines will show
that they have been cut subsequently to the firing of the ware, when
the clay was already hard. Had the inscription been cut when the pot
was made, it would have been incised in a soft unfired substance,
like the writing of a stylus in wax, and the edges of the lines would
be forced up and slightly bulging; and if the ware is glazed, some
of the glaze will be found in the hollows of the inscription. There
are, besides, minor frauds in the nature of repairs. Pieces of old
pottery, for instance, are fitted into a broken Han jar; the lost heads
and limbs of T’ang figures are replaced from other broken specimens,
and defective parts are made up in plaster. Such additions are often
carefully concealed by daubs of clay similar to that with which the
buried specimen had become encrusted. Further than this, Han and T’ang
figures have been recently manufactured in their entirety, and mention
has already been made (Vol. I., p. 27) of a factory at Honan Fu, where
figures and vases with streaked and mottled glazes, fantastic ewers
with phœnix-spouts and wing-like excrescences, and the like, are made
with indifferent skill.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account