Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 2. Ming and Ch'ing PorcelainHobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
History
Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 2. Ming and Ch'ing Porcelain
Hobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
Porcelain, Chinese; Pottery, Chinese
There is little to guide us to the dating of these wares, and marks
are exceptional.[190] There is, however, a flower pot in the British
Museum with white design of _ch’i-lin_ on a brown ground which has
the late Ming mark _yü t’ang chia ch’i_[191]; and a specimen with an
Elizabethan metal mount was exhibited at the Burlington Fine Arts
Club in 1910.[192] These are, no doubt, of Ching-tê Chên make; but
there is a curious specimen in the British Museum which seems to be
of provincial manufacture. It is a dish with slaty blue ground and
plant designs with curious feathery foliage traced with considerable
delicacy. The border of running floral scroll has the flowers outlined
in dots, and the whole execution of the piece is as distinctive as
the strange coarse base which shows a brown-red biscuit and heavy
accretions of sand and grit at the foot rim. The same base and the same
peculiarities of design appeared on a similar dish with celadon glaze
exhibited by Mrs. Halsey at the Burlington Fine Arts Club in 1910,[193]
and in the British Museum there are other dishes clearly of the same
make, but with (1) crackled grey white glaze and coarsely painted blue
decoration, and (2) with greenish white glaze and enamelled designs
in iron red and the Ming blue green. It is clear that we have to deal
here with the productions of one factory, and though we have no direct
clue to its identity, it certainly catered for the export trade to
India and the islands; for the enamelled dishes of this type have been
found in Sumatra. Mrs. Halsey’s dish came from India, and fragments
of the blue and enamelled types were found in the ruins of the palace
at Bijapur,[194] which was destroyed by Aurungzebe in 1686. Probably
the factory was situated in Fukien or Kuangtung, where it would be
in direct touch with the southern export trade, and the style of
the existing specimens points to the late Ming as the period of its
activity.
The process of marbling or “graining” has been tried by potters all the
world over, and the Chinese were no exceptions. The effect is produced
either by slips of two or more coloured clays worked about on the
surface, or by blending layers of clays in two or more colours (usually
brown and white) in the actual body. Early examples of this marbling
occur among the T’ang wares, and Mr. Eumorfopoulos has examples of the
Ming and later periods. One of these, a figure with finely crackled
buff glaze and passages of brown and white marbling in front and on the
back, has an incised inscription, stating that it was modelled by Ch’ên
Wên-ching in the year 1597.[195]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account