Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 2. Ming and Ch'ing PorcelainHobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
History
Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 2. Ming and Ch'ing Porcelain
Hobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
Porcelain, Chinese; Pottery, Chinese
It is said that the natives of the Fukien province are among the most
superstitious of the Chinese, and Bushell[251] sees a reflection of
this religious temperament in the nature of the Tê-hua wares. If this
is so, they must have had exalted opinions of their European visitors,
whom they often furnish with the attributes of Chinese divinities,
representing them in positions and poses which seem to caricature
native deities and sages. There is, for instance, an ornament in form
of a mountain retreat with a shrine in which is seated a figure in a
three-cornered European hat and a Buddha-like attitude. Another group
consists of a European mounted on a _ch’i-lin_, posing as an
Arhat, and another of a European standing on a dragon’s head which
would symbolise to the Chinese the attainment of the highest literary
honours.
There are, besides, in the British Museum collection figures of animals
and birds, the Buddhist lion, the cock, the hawk, or the parrot,
mostly fitted with tubes to hold incense sticks; and there are a pair
of well modelled figures of Chou dogs.
As for the vessels of Tê-hua porcelain, they consist chiefly of incense
vases and incense burners, libation cups shaped after bronze or
rhinoceros horn models, brush pots, wine cups, water vessels for the
study table and the like (often beautifully modelled in the form of
lotus leaves or flowers), boxes, tea and wine pots, cups and bowls, and
more rarely vases.
An extensive trade was done with the European merchants, whose
influence is apparent in many of the wares, such as coffee cups with
handles, mugs of cylindrical form or globular with straight ribbed
necks in German style, and “barber-surgeons’ bowls” with flat pierced
handles copied from silver models. Indeed, the superficially European
appearance of some of these pieces has led serious students to mistake
them for early Meissen porcelain and even for that nebulous porcelain
supposed to have been made by John Dwight, of Fulham, at the end of the
seventeenth century. Père d’Entrecolles[252] incidentally mentions the
fact that some Ching-tê Chên potters had in the past removed to Fukien
in the hope of making profits out of the European traders at Amoy, and
that they had taken their plant and even their materials with them, but
that the enterprise was a failure.
Conversely, the influence of the Tê-hua wares is obvious in many of the
early European porcelains, such as those made at Meissen, St. Cloud,
Bow, and Chelsea, which were often closely modelled on the Fukien
white. There is, indeed, a striking similarity between the creamy
soft-paste porcelain of St. Cloud and the creamy variety of the _blanc
de chine_, both having the same mellow, melting appearance in the glaze.
[Illustration: Plate 86.--Fukien Porcelain, Ming Dynasty.
Fig 1.--Figure of Kuan-yin with boy attendant. Ivory white.
Height 10¼ inches. _Eumorfopoulos Collection._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account