Chips from a German Workshop, Volume 4: Essays Chiefly on the Science of LanguageMüller, F. Max (Friedrich Max)
Religion
Chips from a German Workshop, Volume 4: Essays Chiefly on the Science of Language
Müller, F. Max (Friedrich Max)
Comparative linguistics; Folklore; Literature -- History and criticism; Mythology; Religions
“An erroneous doctrine has been started, as if the great population
of these provinces could not avail to effect improvements,
notwithstanding opportunities afforded by an increased demand for
particular manufactures or for raw produce: because, ‘professions
are hereditary among the Hindus; the offspring of men of one calling
do not intrude into any other; professions are confined to
hereditary descent; and the produce of any particular manufacture
cannot be extended according to the increase of the demand, but must
depend upon the population of the caste, or tribe, which works on
that manufacture; or, in other words, if the demand for any article
should exceed the ability of the number of workmen who produce it,
the deficiency cannot be supplied by calling in assistance from
other tribes.’
“In opposition to this unfounded opinion, it is necessary that we
not only show, as has been already done, that the population is
actually sufficient for great improvement, but we must also prove,
that professions are not separated by an impassable line, and that
the population affords a sufficient number whose religions
prejudices permit, and whose inclination leads them to engage in,
those occupations through which the desired improvement may be
effected.
“The Muselmans, to whom the argument above quoted cannot in any
manner be applied, bear no inconsiderable proportion to the whole
population. Other descriptions of people, not governed by Hindu
institutions, are found among the inhabitants of these provinces; in
regard to these, also, the objection is irrelevant. The Hindus
themselves, to whom the doctrine which we combat is meant to be
applied, cannot exceed nine tenths of the population; probably, they
do not bear so great a proportion to the other tribes. They are, as
is well known, divided into four grand classes; but the three first
of them are much less numerous than the +Śûdra+. The aggregate of
+Brâhmaṇa+, +Kshatriya+, and +Vaiśya+ may amount, at the most, to a
fifth of the population; and even these are not absolutely
restricted to their own appointed occupations. Commerce and
agriculture are universally permitted; and, under the designation of
servants of the other three tribes, the +Śûdras+ seem to be allowed
to prosecute any manufacture.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account