Christianity in relation to Freethought, Scepticism, and Faith: Three discourses by the Bishop of Peterborough with special replies by Mr. C. BradlaughBradlaugh, Charles
Religion
Christianity in relation to Freethought, Scepticism, and Faith: Three discourses by the Bishop of Peterborough with special replies by Mr. C. Bradlaugh
Transcribed from the [1873] Austin and Co. edition by David Price.
CHRISTIANITY
IN RELATION TO
FREETHOUGHT, SCEPTICISM, AND
FAITH:
THREE DISCOURSES
BY THE BISHOP OF PETERBOROUGH.
WITH
SPECIAL REPLIES
BY MR. CHARLES BRADLAUGH.
* * * * *
* * * * *
* * * * *
LONDON:
AUSTIN & CO., 17, JOHNSON’S COURT, FLEET STREET, E.C.
* * * * *
PRICE ONE SHILLING.
ADVERTISEMENT.
IT will be seen by the following Circular and Correspondence how the
Discourses of the Bishop of Peterborough and Mr. Bradlaugh’s Replies
thereto were brought about. The Dean’s Circular speaks of four
Discourses to be delivered by the Bishop, but in fact only the three here
reported were given. This volume, therefore, contains the whole of both
sides of the question, so far as the discussion has hitherto proceeded in
Norwich. The speeches were all taken down by a competent shorthand
reporter, specially engaged for the _National Reformer_.
The reader will clearly see by the Correspondence that the Christians
refused the proposal of the Secularists that the two parties should
co-operate in publishing together and circulating as widely as possible
the Discourses and Replies. Mr. Bradlaugh has therefore taken upon
himself the responsibility of their joint publication. The extraordinary
reasons given by the Dean (in the last paragraph of his letter of Feb.
15th) for refusing the perfectly fair offer of Mr. Cooper, will not pass
unnoted. His claim to certainty _may_ differ from the claim to
infallibility made on behalf of the Pope and the Romish Church, and the
principle on which he condemns the dissemination of Sceptical works as
treason to human welfare, _may_ differ from that which in Rome has led to
the establishment of the _Index Expurgatorius_; but we confess that in
neither case can we see the difference, and we challenge the Dean to show
that there really is any.
We are confident that Freethinkers generally will appreciate the
disinterested zeal of Mr. R. A. Cooper in making all arrangements
necessary to ensure that the Bishop’s Discourses should be fitly answered
on the spot and without delay.
THE PUBLISHERS.
_April_, 1871.
CIRCULAR OF THE DEAN OF NORWICH.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account