Christianity in relation to Freethought, Scepticism, and Faith: Three discourses by the Bishop of Peterborough with special replies by Mr. C. BradlaughBradlaugh, Charles
Religion
Christianity in relation to Freethought, Scepticism, and Faith: Three discourses by the Bishop of Peterborough with special replies by Mr. C. Bradlaugh
Now we have put before us the issue between Christianity and
Freethought. It is necessary that we should define for ourselves
what is Freethought. The word is on men’s lips, and I am not sure
that they understand what they mean by it. Let us try to understand
what is Freethought. It may mean one of three things. It may mean
freedom as opposed to necessity, it may mean freedom as opposed to
authority, or it may mean freedom as opposed to responsibility. As
regards the first of these, by freedom as opposed to necessity, we
mean that a man is free to think in one way or another, that it is
not absolutely necessary for him always to think in one way or
another; that is to say, his thought is not the necessary product of
physical constitution, that his thoughts do not grow out of him, as
the blade grows out of the seed or the flower out of the plant; that
it is not mechanical or necessary, but that a man has the power to
choose how he will think. Then as to freedom as opposed to
authority, we mean that a man is not bound to think like other
men—that is, his thought is not subject to any other man’s, and he
has a right to say, “That is your opinion and not mine.” Freedom of
thought as opposed to responsibility means that a man is not
answerable for his belief, and that whatever he thinks on any
subject, he is never to suffer for his belief in any way whatever.
These three are the only possible meanings.
Now let us take them in their order.
First, freedom of thought as opposed to necessity. Does Christianity
deny this freedom? On the contrary, it asserts and vindicates it.
Christianity teaches that man is free, and terribly free, to will his
own belief. It teaches this by the fact that it tells us a man is
answerable for his belief, for a man cannot be answerable for that in
which he has no choice, any more than he has of the colour of his
hair. If he be answerable, it can only be because he has the power
of choosing. It is remarkable that many people who call themselves
Freethinkers, insist on it that man is not answerable for his belief
any more than for the colour of his hair. They thus deny the freedom
of thought. Freedom and responsibility always go together; so you
see in this view of Freethought, Christianity, so far from denying
it, asserts it against many Freethinkers; and in this respect the
Christian is the Freethinker, and maintains the doctrine of
Freethought.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account