Christianity in relation to Freethought, Scepticism, and Faith: Three discourses by the Bishop of Peterborough with special replies by Mr. C. BradlaughBradlaugh, Charles
Religion
Christianity in relation to Freethought, Scepticism, and Faith: Three discourses by the Bishop of Peterborough with special replies by Mr. C. Bradlaugh
alive nothing that breatheth?”
I say that this is not a revelation of love; it is the revelation, the
outgrowth of the instincts, of a barbarous and brutal people. My Lord
Bishop, not content with relying on this revelation, after telling us
that the existence of a Deity cannot be demonstrated, seeks to supply us
with a demonstration by a vague reference to the argument from design.
He says that there are in the universe evidences of a designer. This
argument from design is a most dangerous one, for the existence of stings
and fangs may be evidences of a designing malevolence; but permit me to
dismiss the argument with a quotation from Sir William Hamilton. He
says:
“We are utterly unable to conceive that it is possible for the
complement of existence to have been either increased or diminished.
We cannot, on the one hand, conceive of nothing becoming something,
or on the other hand, of something becoming nothing.”
I challenge the Lord Bishop to show that it is possible to imagine any
time when the whole of the universe did not exist. Creation! who is it
that really believes in creation? Do any of you? Let us fathom the
depths of the past as far back as we will, there is still the great
impenetrable beyond. No man, even in thought, can annihilate existence,
or bring to light a first evolution of nature, and say, Here the universe
began. There can be no origination of the universe conceivable by the
human mind. But suppose you could in thought annihilate the universe.
You say that God is unchangeable. Was there a moment when he began to
create? Then is not that an assumption of an act of change? I will not
stop to argue on this point. The bishop did not on this head condescend
to argue at all. His third sermon was only a torrent of ably delivered
words, and however fitting it might be for those whose faith was firm, it
was useless for drawing to the Church those without faith. The Bishop
says, Our faith in Christ is confirmed by the story of his life as
recorded by his disciples. He says that whether the Gospel of John is
true or untrue, it contains the delineation of a perfect being. He spoke
of Christ as being better than any man the world has yet seen, as the
only teacher whose life was better than his teaching. What is the
history of his life? Jesus was born without a father. His mother’s
husband had two fathers. Jesus was descended from David, through Joseph,
who was not his father. He was born in the reign of Herod, but was not
born till after the death of Herod. Jesus passed his early life in
Egypt, but he was during the same time in Judæa. He was baptised by
John, who knew him before the baptism, but who did not know him till he
had been baptised. Jesus was taken into the wilderness, where he fasted
forty days, but he was during part of the same time at a marriage feast
in Cana of Galilee. During the forty days’ fasting, the devil took Jesus
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account