Christopher Columbus: His Life and His WorkAdams, Charles Kendall
History
Christopher Columbus: His Life and His Work
Adams, Charles Kendall
Columbus, Christopher, 1451-1506
Transcriber’s Note: Italics are indicated by _underscores_, boldface by
=equals signs=.
CHRISTOPHER COLUMBUS
His Life and His Work
[Illustration: THE LOTTO PORTRAIT OF COLUMBUS.]
“MAKERS OF AMERICA”
CHRISTOPHER COLUMBUS
His Life and His Work
BY
CHARLES KENDALL ADAMS, LL.D.
PRESIDENT OF CORNELL UNIVERSITY
NEW YORK
DODD, MEAD AND COMPANY
1892
_Copyright, 1892_,
BY DODD, MEAD AND CO.
_All rights reserved._
University Press:
JOHN WILSON AND SON, CAMBRIDGE.
TO
J. J. HAGERMAN,
_Nobleman and Friend_,
THIS VOLUME IS AFFECTIONATELY DEDICATED
BY THE AUTHOR.
PREFACE.
In this little volume I have made an attempt to present in popular form
the results of the latest researches in regard to the life and work of
Columbus.
While constant use has been made of the original authorities, it has
been my effort to interpret the conflicting statements with which
these sources abound, in the spirit of modern criticism. The principal
authorities used have been the Letters and the Journal of Columbus,
the History of the Admiral purporting to be by his son Fernando, the
histories of the time by Las Casas, Bernaldez, Oviedo, Peter Martyr,
and Herrera, and the invaluable collection of documents by Navarrete.
Of the greatest importance are the writings of Columbus and Las Casas.
As will appear in the course of the volume, the writings of the Admiral
abound in passages that are contradictory or irreconcilable. In the
interpretation of conflicting statements, assistance has been received
from the numerous writings of Henry Harrisse. The researches of this
acute critic in the manuscript records, as well as in the published
writings of Italy and Spain, make his works indispensable to a correct
understanding of the age of Columbus.
I have not, however, been able to adopt without reservation his views
in regard to the work attributed to the son of the Admiral. The
force of Harrisse’s reasoning is unquestionable; but, as it seems to
me, there is internal evidence that the author of the book, whether
Fernando or not, had unusual opportunities for knowledge in regard to
the matters about which he wrote. While, therefore, I have used the
work with great caution, I have not felt justified in rejecting it as
altogether spurious.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account