Chronicles (1 of 6): The Description of Britaine — John Shaqi
Chronicles (1 of 6): The Description of BritaineHolinshed, Raphael
History
Chronicles (1 of 6): The Description of Britaine
Holinshed, Raphael
Great Britain -- History -- To 1485; Great Britain -- History -- Tudors, 1485-1603
[Sidenote: Scots.]
[Sidenote: Picts.]
How and when the Scots, a people mixed of the Scithian and Spanish
blood, should arriue here out of Ireland, & when the Picts should come
vnto vs out of Sarmatia, or from further toward the north & the
Scithian Hyperboreans, as yet it is vncerteine. For though the Scotish
histories doo carrie great countenance of their antiquitie in this
Iland: yet (to saie fréelie what I thinke) I iudge them rather to haue
stolne in hither within the space of 100. yeares before Christ, than
to haue continued here so long as they themselues pretend, if my
coniecture be any thing. Yet I denie not, but that as the Picts were
long planted in this Iland before the Scots aduentured to settle
themselues also in Britaine; so the Scots did often aduenture hither
to rob and steale out of Ireland, and were finallie called in by the
Meats or Picts (as the Romans named them, because they painted their
bodies) to helpe them against the Britains, after the which they so
planted themselues in these parts, that vnto our time that portion of
the land cannot be cleansed of them. I find also that as these Scots
were reputed for the most Scithian-like and barbarous nation, and
longest without letters; so they vsed commonlie to steale ouer into
Britaine in leather skewes, and began to helpe the Picts about or not
long before the beginning of Cesars time. For both Diodorus lib. 6.
and Strabo lib. 4. doo seeme to speake of a parcell of the Irish
nation that should inhabit Britaine in their time, which were giuen to
the eating of mans flesh, and therefore called Anthropophagi.
Mamertinus in like sort dooth note the Redshanks and the Irish (which
are properlie the Scots) to be the onelie enimies of our nation,
before the comming of Cæsar, as appeareth in his panegyricall oration,
so that hereby it is found that they are no new ghestes in Britaine.
Wherefore all the controuersie dooth rest in the time of their first
attempt to inhabit in this Iland. Certeinlie I maruell much whie they
trauell not to come in with Cantaber and Partholonus: but I see
perfectlie that this shift should be too grosse for the maintenance of
their desired antiquitie. Now, as concerning their name, the Saxons
translated the word Scotus for Irish: whereby it appeareth that those
Irish, of whom Strabo and Diodorus doo speake, are none other than
those Scots, of whom Ierome speaketh Aduersus Iouinianum, lib. 2. who
vsed to feed on the buttocks of boies and womens paps, as delicate
dishes. Aethicus writing of the Ile of Man, affirmeth it to be
inhabited with Scots so well as Ireland euen in his time. Which is
another proofe that the Scots and Irish are all one people. They were
also called Scoti by the Romans, bicause their Iland & originall
inhabitation thereof were vnknowne, and they themselues an obscure
[Sidenote: Of the Picts.]
nation in the sight of all the world. Now as concerning the Picts,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account