Chronicles of Newgate, Vol. 2: From the eighteenth century to its demolitionGriffiths, Arthur
History
Chronicles of Newgate, Vol. 2: From the eighteenth century to its demolition
Griffiths, Arthur
Criminals -- Great Britain; Newgate (Prison : London, England); Prisons -- England; Punishment -- Great Britain
Juries began
to decline to convict on the evidence of inspectors and clerks,
unless substantiated by the revelation of the private mark, a highly
inconvenient practice, which the Bank itself naturally discountenanced.
Efforts were made to improve the quality of the note, so as to defy
imitation; but this could not well be done at the price, and, as the
only effective remedy, specie payments were resumed, and the one-pound
note withdrawn from circulation. But execution for forgery continued
to be the law for many more years. Fauntleroy suffered for it in 1824;
Joseph Hunton, the Quaker linen-draper, in 1828; and Maynard, the last,
in the following year.
I am, however, anticipating somewhat, and must retrace my steps, and
indicate briefly one or two of the early forgers who passed through
Newgate and suffered for the crime. The first case I find recorded is
that of Richard Vaughan, a linen-draper of Stafford, who was committed
to Newgate in March, 1758, for counterfeiting Bank of England notes.
He employed several artists to engrave the notes in various parts, one
of whom informed against him. The value of the note he himself added.
Twenty which he had thus filled up he had deposited in the hands of a
young lady to whom he was paying his addresses, as a guarantee of his
wealth. Vaughan no doubt suffered, although I see no record of the fact
in the Newgate Calendar.
Mr. Gibson's was a curious case. He was a prisoner in Newgate for
eighteen months between conviction and execution, the jury having found
a special verdict, subject to the determination of the twelve judges.
As Gibson remained so long in gaol, it was the general opinion that no
further notice would be taken of the case. The prisoner himself must
have been buoyed up with this hope, as he petitioned repeatedly for
judgment. He had been sentenced in Sept. 1766, and in 1768, at Hilary
Term, the judges decided that his crime came within the meaning of the
law. Gibson had been a solicitor's clerk, who gave so much satisfaction
that he was taken into partnership. The firm was doing a large
business, and among other large affairs was intrusted with a Chancery
case, respecting an estate for which an _ad interim_ receiver had
been appointed. Gibson's way of life was immoral and extravagant. He
had urgent need of funds, and in an evil hour he forged the signature
of the Accountant-General to the Court of Chancery, and so obtained
possession of some of the rents of the above-mentioned estate. The
fraud was presently discovered; Gibson was arrested, and eventually,
as already stated, condemned. "After sentence," says the Calendar,
"his behaviour was in every way becoming his awful situation; . . . he
appeared rational, serious, and devout. His behaviour was so pious,
so resigned, and in all respects so admirably adapted to his unhappy
situation, that the tears of the commiserating multitude accompanied
his last ejaculation. He was carried to execution in a mourning coach,"
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account