Church History, Volume 3 (of 3)Kurtz, J. H. (Johann Heinrich)
History
Church History, Volume 3 (of 3)
Kurtz, J. H. (Johann Heinrich)
Church history
c. The Church and the Pastorate. Orthodoxy regarded word and
sacrament and the ministry which administered them as the
basis and foundation of the church; pietism held that the
individual believers determined the character and existence
of the church. In the one case the church was thought
to beget, nurse, and nourish believers; in the other
believers, constituted, maintained, and renewed the church,
accomplishing this best by conventicles, in which living
Christianity preserved itself and diffused its influence
abroad. The orthodox laid great stress upon clerical
ordination and the grace of office; pietists on the person
and his faith. Spener had taught that only he who has
experienced in his own heart the power of the gospel,
_i.e._ he who has been born again, can be a true preacher
and pastor. Löscher maintained that the official acts of an
unconverted preacher, if only he be orthodox, may be blessed
as well as those of a converted man, because saving power
lies not in the person of the preacher, but in the word of
God which he preaches, in its purity and simplicity, and in
the sacraments which he dispenses in accordance with their
institution. The pietists then went so far as absolutely
to deny that saving results could follow the preaching of
an unconverted man. The proclamation of forgiveness by the
church without the inward sealing had for them no meaning;
yea, they regarded it as dangerous, because it quieted
conscience and made sinners secure. Hence they keenly
opposed private confession and churchly absolution. Of a
special grace of office they would know nothing: the true
ordination is the new birth; each regenerate one, and such
a one only, is a true priest. The orthodox insisted above
all on pure doctrine and the church confession; the pietists
too regarded this as necessary, but not as the main thing.
Spener decidedly maintained the duty of accepting the church
symbols; but later pietists rejected them as man’s work, and
so containing errors. Among the orthodox, again, some went
so far as to claim for their symbols absolute immunity from
error. Spener’s opposition to the compulsory use of fixed
Scripture portions, prescribed forms of prayer, and the
exorcism formulary occasioned the most violent contentions.
On the other hand, his reintroduction of the confirmation
service before the first communion, which had fallen into
general desuetude, was imitated, and soon widely prevailed,
even among the orthodox.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account