Church History, Volume 3 (of 3)Kurtz, J. H. (Johann Heinrich)
History
Church History, Volume 3 (of 3)
Kurtz, J. H. (Johann Heinrich)
Church history
d. Eschatology. Spener had interpreted the biblical doctrine of
the 1,000 years’ reign as meaning that, after the overthrow
of the papacy and the conversion of heathens and Jews, a
period of the most glorious and undisturbed tranquillity
would dawn for the kingdom of Christ on earth as prelude
to the eternal sabbath. His opponents denounced this as
chiliasm and fanaticism.
e. There was, finally, a controversy about Divine providence
occasioned by the founding of Francke’s orphan house at
Halle. The pietists pointed to the establishment and growth
of this institution as an instance of immediate divine
providence; while Löscher, by indicating the common means
employed to secure success, reduced the whole affair to the
domain of general and daily providence, without denying the
value of the strong faith in God and the active love that
characterized its founder, as well as the importance of the
Divine blessing which rested upon the work.[499]
§ 167.3. =Theology= (§ 159, 4).--The last two important
representatives of the =Old Orthodox School= were =Löscher=, who,
besides his polemic against pietism, made learned contributions
to biblical philology and church history; and his companion in
arms, =Cyprian= of Gotha, who died in A.D. 1745, the ablest
combatant of Arnold’s “_Ketzerhistorie_,” and opponent of union
efforts and of the papacy.--The =Pietist School=, more fruitful
in practical than scientific theology, contributed to devotional
literature many works that will never be forgotten. The learned
and voluminous writer =Joachim Lange=, who died A.D. 1744, the
most skilful controversialist among the Halle pietists, author
of the “Halle Latin Grammar,” which reached its sixtieth edition
in A.D. 1809, published a commentary on the whole Bible in
seven folio vols. after the Cocceian method. Of importance as
a historian of the Reformation was =Salig= of Wolfenbüttel,
who died in A.D. 1738. =Christian Thomasius= at first attached
himself to the pietists as an opponent of the rigid adherence
to the letter of the orthodox, but was repudiated by them as an
indifferentist. To him belongs the honour of having turned public
opinion against the persecution of witches (§ 117, 4). Out of
the contentions of pietists and orthodox there now rose a =third
school=, in which Lutheran theology and learning were united with
genuine piety and profound thinking, decided confessionalism with
moderation and fairness. Its most distinguished representatives
were =Hollaz= of Pomerania, died 1713 (“_Examen Theologicum
Acroamaticum_”); =Buddeus= of Jena, died 1729 (“_Hist. Ecclst.
V.T._,” “_Instit. Theol. Dogma_,” “_Isagoge Hist. Theol. Univ._”);
=J. Chr. Wolf= of Homburg, died 1739 (“_Biblioth. Hebr._,” “_Curæ
Philol. et Crit. in N.T._”); =Weismann= of Tübingen, died 1747
(“_Hist.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account