Church History, Volume 3 (of 3)Kurtz, J. H. (Johann Heinrich)
History
Church History, Volume 3 (of 3)
Kurtz, J. H. (Johann Heinrich)
Church history
Ecclst._”); =Carpzov= of Leipzig, died A.D. 1767 as
superintendent at Lübeck (“_Critica s. V.T._,” “_Introductio
ad Libros cen. V.T._,” “_Apparatus Antiquitt. s. Codicis_”);
=J. H. Michaelis= of Halle, died 1731 (“_Biblia. Hebr. c.
Variis Lectionibus et Brev. Annott._,” “_Uberiores Annott. in
Hagiograph._”); assisted in both by his learned nephew =Chr. Ben.
Michaelis= of Halle, died 1764; =J. G. Walch= of Jena, died 1755
(“_Einl. in die Religionsstreitigkeiten_,” “_Biblioth. Theol.
Selecta_,” “_Biblioth. Patristica_,” “_Luther’s Werke_”); =Chr.
Meth. Pfaff= of Tübingen, died 1760 (“_K. G., K. Recht, Dogmatik,
Moral_”); =L. von Mosheim= of Helmstädt [Helmstadt] and Göttingen,
died 1755, the father of modern church history (“_Institt. Hist.
Ecclst._,” “_Commentarii Rebus Christ. ante Constant. M._,”
“_Dissertationes_,” etc.); =J. Alb. Bengel= of Stuttgart, died
1752 (“_Gnomon N.T._,” a commentary on the N.T. distinguished
by pregnancy of expression and profundity of thought; from
his interpretation of Revelation he expected the millennium to
begin in A.D. 1836); and =Chr. A. Crusius= of Leipzig, died 1775
(“_Hypomnemata ad Theol. Propheticam._”)--A =fourth= theological
school arose out of the application of the mathematical
method of demonstration by the philosopher =Chr. von Wolff=
of Halle, who died A.D. 1754. Wolff attached himself to
the philosophical system of Leibnitz, and sought to unite
philosophy and Christianity; but under the manipulation of his
logico-mathematical method of proof he took all vitality out of
the system, and the pre-established harmony of the world became
a purely mechanical clockwork. He looked merely to the logical
accuracy of Christian truths, without seeking to penetrate their
inner meaning, gave formal exercise to the understanding, while
the heart was left empty and cold; and thus inevitably revelation
and mystery made way for a mere natural theology. Hence the
charge brought against the system of tending to fatalism and
atheism, not only by narrow pietists like Lange, but by able
and liberal theologians like Buddeus and Crusius, was quite
justifiable. By a cabinet order of Frederick William I. in
A.D. 1723 Wolff was deposed, and ordered within two days,
on pain of death, to quit the Prussian states. But so soon as
Frederick II. ascended the throne, in A.D. 1740, he recalled the
philosopher to Halle from Marburg, where he had meanwhile taught
with great success.[500] =Sig. Jac. Baumgarten=, the pious and
learned professor in Halle, who died in A.D. 1757, was the first
to introduce Wolff’s method into theology. In respect of contents
his theology occupies essentially the old orthodox ground.
The ablest promoter of the system was =John Carpov= of Weimar,
who died in A.D. 1768 (“_Theol. Revelata Meth. Scientifica
Adornata_”). When applied to sermons, the Wolffian method led
to the most extreme insipidity and absurdity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account