of citizens--Citizens establish government to protect existing human rights--Only “subjects” get any rights or privileges from government--All early Americans knew these primal truths--Neither the French aristocrats, before French Revolution, nor Tories of 1776 in England or America knew them--Eighteenth Amendment Tories do not know them--Madison (in 1789) and Supreme Court (in 1890) knew that commodities named in new Amendment are among those in which a human right “of traffic exists”--In litigations of 1920, no counsel appear on behalf of the human rights of American citizens--But we know that no decision of our own Supreme Court, established to secure our human rights, although the decision may settle disputes between other litigants, can change us from “citizens” into “subjects.” XXI. BRIEFS IGNORE THE AMERICAN CITIZEN _Page 325_ No counsel knows all are discussing whether Americans, twelve years after 1776, voluntarily became “subjects”--Common concept of all that Fifth Article a “grant” of power to state governments (of state citizens) making them attorneys-in-fact for citizens of America--Discussion entirely as to extent of power “granted”--Eighteenth Amendment concept that Fifth Article “grant” made some governments of state citizens a supreme American Parliament, unrestrained master of every human right of all American citizens--Opposing concept that the Fifth Article “grant” made those state governments a Parliament whose one limit is that it cannot interfere with the sovereignty of any political entity which is a state--Both concepts ignore supremacy of nation of men over federation of states--Both ignore dual nature of “one national and federal Constitution”--Both ignore “conventions” in Seventh and Fifth Articles as the citizens of the American nation--Both ignore that each state “legislature” is attorney-in-fact for the citizens of its own state and that no legislatures are (except Congress in enumerated matters) attorneys-in-fact for the citizens of America in any matter--Our facts, brought from our education with the early Americans, all ignored by all counsel in the litigations--The Virginia Convention itself and Lee, Pinckney, Hamilton, Madison, Wilson, Iredell and others state what all counsel of 1920 entirely ignore. XXII. NO CHALLENGE TO THE TORY CONCEPT _Page 335_