Constitutional history -- United States; United States -- Politics and government; United States. Constitution. 18th Amendment
And now we examine the only other challenge that _was_ made, a
challenge negatived by the third conclusion of the Supreme Court. No
challenge could more emphatically ignore the protected individual
liberty of the citizen of America. This challenge does not know
that American citizens have _no_ government save the government of
enumerated powers. This challenge frankly admits that the Fifth
Article is a grant to legislatures, each elected by the citizens _of
some particular state_, and that three fourths of those legislatures
have the omnipotence, which was denied to the British Parliament,
over every individual liberty of the American citizen. Like the other
challenges that _were_ made, like every brief for or against the
Eighteenth Amendment, this challenge knows not that the Constitution
is both a _federal_ and a _national_ Constitution and knows not that
the state “legislatures” never have and never can have aught to do with
the _national_ aspect of that Constitution. Based on this remarkable
ignorance, this is the challenge, frankly stated in our own words:
“The state legislatures _can_ make this Eighteenth Amendment. The state
governments _can_ do what they will, so long as they call their action
a constitutional Amendment, with every reserved right and power of the
citizens of America. But thirty-six state legislatures are necessary to
make anything called a constitutional Amendment. And our challenge is
that thirty-six legislatures have not made this particular Eighteenth
Amendment. In any state, where the referendum exists, the citizens
_of that state_ [we note that even now the citizens _of America_ are
not mentioned] are part of the state legislature. In some of these
referendum states, whose legislatures are included among your claimed
thirty-six ratifiers for the Eighteenth Amendment, the whole of the
state legislature has not yet ratified, because the citizens of the
state, who are part of its legislature, have not yet acted. For this
reason, that you ignore the rights of the citizens _of some states_,
our challenge is that the Eighteenth Amendment has not been ratified by
the legislative governments of thirty-six states.”
This particular challenge, like everything in these litigations and
in the whole history of the supposed new Amendment, brings into bold
relief the one monumental error at the bottom of every thought that the
new Amendment _is_ in the Constitution, at the bottom of the varied
absurdities which constantly appear in every brief, either for or
against validity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account