Civilization and ethics : $b The philosophy of civilization, part 2Schweitzer, Albert
Philosophy
Civilization and ethics : $b The philosophy of civilization, part 2
Schweitzer, Albert
Civilization -- History; Ethics
Our great mistake, however, is thinking that we can reach without
mysticism an ethical world- and life-view, which shall satisfy thought.
Up to now we have done nothing but fabricate world- and life-views.
They are good because they keep men up to activist ethics, but they
are not true, and therefore they are always collapsing. Moreover they
are not deep. Hence European thought makes men ethical indeed, but
superficial, and the European, because he is surfeited with world-view
which has been fabricated with a view to activist ethics, has no
collectedness and no inward personality, nor indeed any feeling of
need for these things.
It is indeed time for us to abandon this error. Depth and stability in
thinking come to the world- and life-view of activist ethics only when
this springs from mysticism. The question of what we are to make of
our life is not solved by our being driven out into the world with an
impulse to activity, and never being allowed to collect ourselves for
thought. It can be really answered only by a world- and life-view which
brings man into a spiritual inward relation to Being, out of which
there results of natural necessity an ethic both passive and active.
The hitherto accepted mysticism cannot effect this because it is
supra-ethical. The struggle of thought has therefore to direct itself
upon ethical mysticism. We must rise to a spirituality which is
ethical, and to an ethic which includes within itself all
spirituality. Then only do we become profoundly qualified for life.
Ethics must resolve to originate in mysticism. Mysticism, on its side,
must never think that it exists for its own sake. It is not a flower,
but only the calyx. Ethics are [pg 241] the flower. Mysticism which
exists for itself only is the salt which has lost its savour.
The hitherto accepted mysticism leads into the supra-ethical because
it is abstract, and abstraction is the death of ethics, for ethics are
a living relation for a living life. We must therefore abandon
abstract mysticism, and turn to the mysticism which is alive.
Abstract mysticism and the mysticism of reality. Supra-ethical, and
ethical mysticism
The Essence of Being, the Absolute, the World-spirit, and all similar
expressions denote nothing actual, but something conceived in
abstractions which for that reason it is also absolutely impossible to
represent to the mind. The only reality is the Being which manifests
itself in phenomena.
How does thought come to such a meaningless proceeding as making man
enter into a spiritual relation with an unreal creation of thought? By
yielding to temptation in two ways, one general, one particular.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account