Civilization and ethics : $b The philosophy of civilization, part 2Schweitzer, Albert
Philosophy
Civilization and ethics : $b The philosophy of civilization, part 2
Schweitzer, Albert
Civilization -- History; Ethics
Is there, however, any sense in ploughing for the thousand and second
time a field which has already been ploughed a thousand and one times?
Has not everything which can be said about ethics already been said by
Lao-tse, Confucius, the Buddha, and Zarathustra; by Amos and Isaiah;
by Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle; by Epicurus and the Stoics; by
Jesus and Paul; by the thinkers of the Renaissance, of the
“Aufklärung,” and of Rationalism; by Locke, Shaftesbury, and Hume; by
Spinoza and Kant; by Fichte and Hegel; by Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, and
others? Is there a possibility of getting beyond all these so
materially contradictory convictions of the past to something new
which will have a stronger and more lasting influence? Can the ethical
kernel of the thoughts of all these men be collected into an idea of
the ethical, which will unite all the energies to which they appeal?
We must hope so, if we are not to despair of the fate of the human
race.
Does thought about ethics bring more ethics into the world? The
confused picture offered us by the history of ethics is enough to make
one sceptical about it. On the other hand, it is clear that ethical
thinkers like Socrates, Kant, or Fichte had a moralizing influence on
many of their [pg 022] contemporaries. From every revival of ethical
reflexion there went forth ethical movements which made the
contemporary generation fitter for its tasks. If any age lacks the
minds which force it to reflect about the ethical, the level of its
morality sinks and with it its capacity for answering the questions
which present themselves to it.
In the history of ethical thought we wander in the innermost circles
of world-history. Of all the forces which mould reality morality is
the first and foremost. It is the determining knowledge which we must
wring from thought. Everything else is more or less secondary.
For this reason everyone who believes that he can contribute something
to help forward the ethical self-consciousness of society and of
individuals has the right to speak now, although it is political and
economic questions that the present day prescribes for study. For what
is inopportune is really opportune. We can accomplish something
lasting in the problems of political and economic life only if we
approach them as men who are trying to think ethically. All those who
help forward in any way our thought about ethics are working for the
coming of peace and prosperity to the world. They are engaged in the
higher politics, and the higher rational economics, and even if all
they can do is nothing more than to bring ethical thinking to the
fore, they have nevertheless done something valuable. All reflexion
about ethics has as one result a raising and rousing of the general
disposition to morality.
The search for a basic principle of morality
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account