Classics of modern science : $b (Copernicus to Pasteur)
History
Classics of modern science : $b (Copernicus to Pasteur)
Science; Science -- History
Let there exist, then (and may it be of advantage to both), two
sources, and two distributions of learning, and in like manner
two tribes, and as it were kindred families of contemplators or
philosophers, without any hostility or alienation between them; but
rather allied and united by mutual assistance. Let there be, in short,
one method of cultivating the sciences, and another in discovering
them. And as for those who prefer and more readily receive the former,
on account of their haste or from motives arising from their ordinary
life, or because they are unable from weakness of mind to comprehend
and embrace the other (which must necessarily be the case with by
far the greater number), let us wish that they may prosper as they
desire in their undertaking, and attain what they pursue. But if any
individual desire, and is anxious not merely to adhere to, and make
use of present discoveries, but to penetrate still further, and not
to overcome his adversaries in disputes, but nature by labor, not in
short to give elegant and specious opinions, but to know to a certainty
and demonstration, let him, as a true son of science (if such be his
wish), join with us; that when he has left the antechambers of nature
trodden by the multitude, an entrance may at last be discovered to her
inner apartments. And in order to be better understood, and to render
our meaning more familiar by assigning determinate names, we have
accustomed ourselves to call the one method the anticipation of the
mind, and the other the interpretation of nature.
We have still one request left. We have at least reflected and taken
pains, in order to render our propositions not only true, but of easy
and familiar access to men’s minds, however wonderfully prepossessed
and limited. Yet it is but just that we should obtain this favor from
mankind (especially in so great a restoration of learning and the
sciences), that whosoever may be desirous of forming any determination
upon an opinion of this our work either from his own perceptions,
or the crowd of authorities, or the forms of demonstrations, he
will not expect to be able to do so in a cursory manner, and whilst
attending to other matters; but in order to have a thorough knowledge
of the subject, will himself, by degrees, attempt the course which we
describe and maintain; will be accustomed to the subtlety of things
which is manifested by experience; and will correct the depraved and
deeply-rooted habits of his mind by a seasonable, and, as it were, just
hesitation: and then, finally (if he will), use his judgment when he
has begun to be master of himself.
ON THE INTERPRETATION OF NATURE, OR THE REIGN OF MAN[3]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account