Classics of modern science : $b (Copernicus to Pasteur)
History
Classics of modern science : $b (Copernicus to Pasteur)
Science; Science -- History
In order to be more easily understood in his remarks on the comparative
disposition of the heavenly bodies, Dr. H. mentions some of the
particulars which introduced the ideas of connection and disjunction:
for these, being properly founded on an examination of objects that
may be reviewed at any time, will be of considerable importance to the
validity of what we may advance with regard to the lately discovered
nebulous stars. On June 27, 1786, he saw a beautiful cluster of very
small stars of various sizes, about 15' in diameter, and very rich
of stars. On viewing this object, it is impossible to withhold our
assent to the idea which occurs, that these stars are connected so far
with one another as to be gathered together, within a certain space,
of little extent when compared to the vast expanse of the heavens.
As this phenomenon has been repeatedly seen in a thousand cases, Dr.
H. thinks he may justly lay great stress on the idea of such stars
being connected. On September 9, 1779, he discovered a very small star
near _ε_ Bootis. The question here occurring, whether it had any
connection with _ε_ or not, was determined in the negative; for,
considering the number of stars scattered in a variety of places, it is
very far from being uncommon, that a star at a great distance should
happen to be nearly in a line drawn from the sun through _ε_, and
thus constitute the observed double star. September 7, 1782, when Dr.
H. first saw the planetary nebula near υ Aquarii, he pronounced it to
be a system whose parts were connected together. Without entering
into any kind of calculation, it is evident that a certain degree of
light within a very small space, joined to the particular shape this
object presents to us, which is nearly round, and even in its deviation
consistent with regularity, being a little elliptical, ought naturally
to give us the idea of a conjunction in the things that produce it.
And a considerable addition to this argument may be derived from a
repetition of the same phenomenon, in nine or ten more of a similar
construction.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account