Classics of modern science : $b (Copernicus to Pasteur)
History
Classics of modern science : $b (Copernicus to Pasteur)
Science; Science -- History
No doubt you will not fail to ask me first what I understand by fire
matter. I reply with Franklin, Boerhaave and some of the philosophers
of old, that the matter of fire or of light is a very subtle, very
elastic fluid, which surrounds every part of the planet we live
on, which penetrates with more or less ease the substances which
compose that, and which tends, when it is free, to come to a state of
equilibrium in all.
I will add, borrowing the chemical phraseology, that this fluid is the
solvent of a large number of substances; that it combines with them
in the same way that water does with salt, and the acids with metals,
and that the bodies thus combined and dissolved by the igneous fluid
lose in part the properties which they had before the combination and
acquire new ones which bring them nearer (make them more like) the fire
matter.
It is thus, as I have shown in a memoir deposited with the secretary
of this Academy, that every aeriform fluid, every kind of air, is a
resultant of the combination of some substance, solid or fluid, with
the matter of fire or of light; and it is to this combination that
aeriform fluids owe their elasticity, their specific volatility, their
rarity, and all the other properties which ally (_rapprochent_)
them to the igneous fluid.
Pure air, according to this, what Mr. Priestley calls dephlogisticated
air, is an igneous compound into which the matter of fire or of light
enters as solvent, and into which some other substance enters as a
base; but if, in any solution whatever, a substance is presented to
the base with which that has greater affinity, it unites with this
instantly and the solvent which it leaves is set free.
The same thing happens with the air in combustion; the substance
which burns steals away the base; then the fire matter which served
as its solvent becomes free, regains its rights and escapes with the
characteristics by which we know it; that is to say, with flame, heat
and light.
To elucidate whatever may seem obscure in this theory let us apply it
to some examples: when a metal is calcined in pure air, the base of the
air, which has less affinity for its own solvent than for the metal,
unites with the latter as it melts and converts it into metallic calx.
This combination of the base of the air with the metal is proved 1st,
by the increase in weight which the latter undergoes in calcination;
2nd, by the almost total using up of the air under the receiving bell.
But, if the base of the air was held in solution by the fire matter,
in proportion as this base combined with the metal, the fire matter
should become free and produce, in freeing itself, flame and light. You
understand that the more speedy the calcination of the metal, that is
to say, the more fixation of the air takes place in a given time, the
more fire matter will be liberated, and, consequently, the more marked
and obvious the combustion will be.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account