Classics of modern science : $b (Copernicus to Pasteur)
History
Classics of modern science : $b (Copernicus to Pasteur)
Science; Science -- History
Dalton, on arbitrary suppositions as to the most likely relative number
of molecules in compounds, has endeavoured to fix ratios between the
masses of the molecules of simple substances. Our hypothesis, supposing
it well founded, puts us in a position to confirm or rectify his
results from precise data, and, above all, to assign the magnitude of
compound molecules according to the volumes of the gaseous compounds,
which depend partly on the division of molecules entirely unsuspected
by this physicist.
Thus Dalton supposes that water is formed by the union of hydrogen and
oxygen, molecule to molecule. From this, and from the ratio by weight
of the two components, it would follow that the mass of the molecule of
oxygen would be to that of hydrogen as 7-1/2 to 1 nearly, or, according
to Dalton’s evaluation, as 6 to 1. This ratio on our hypothesis is,
as we saw, twice as great, namely, as 15 to 1. As for the molecule of
water, its mass ought to be roughly expressed by 15 + 2 = 17 (taking
for unity that of hydrogen), if there were no division of the molecule
into two; but on account of this division it is reduced to half, 8-1/2,
or more exactly 8.537, as may also be found directly by dividing the
density of aqueous vapour 0.625 (Gay-Lussac) by the density of hydrogen
0.0732. This mass only differs from 7, that assigned to it by Dalton,
by the difference in the values for the composition of water; so that
in this respect Dalton’s result is approximately correct from the
combination of two compensating errors,--the error in the mass of the
molecule of oxygen, and his neglect of the division of the molecule.
FOOTNOTES:
[Footnote 27: Translated from _Essai d’une manière de déterminer
les masses relatives des molécules élémentaires des corps,
et les proportions selon lesquelles elles entrent dans les
combinaisons_--_Journal de Physique_, (1811).]
XXV
SIR HUMPHREY DAVY
1778-1829
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account