Classics of modern science : $b (Copernicus to Pasteur)
History
Classics of modern science : $b (Copernicus to Pasteur)
Science; Science -- History
The metabolic power of the cells is arrested not only by powerful
chemical actions, such as destroy organic substances in general, but
also by matters which chemically are less uncongenial; for instance,
concentrated solutions of neutral salts. Other substances, as arsenic,
do so in less quantity. The metabolic phenomena may be altered in
quality by other substances, both organic and inorganic, and a change
of this kind may result even from mechanical impressions on the cells.
Such are the most essential characteristics of the fundamental powers
of the cell, so far as they can as yet be deduced from the phenomena.
And now, in order to comprehend distinctly in what the peculiarity of
the formative process of a cell, and therefore in what the peculiarity
of the essential phenomenon in the formation of organized bodies
consist, we will compare this process with a phenomenon of inorganic
nature as nearly as possible similar to it. Disregarding all that
is specially peculiar to the formation of cells, in order to find a
more general definition in which it may be included with a process
occurring in inorganic nature, we may view it as a process in which a
solid body of definite and regular shape is formed in a fluid at the
expense of a substance held in solution by that fluid. The process of
crystallization in inorganic nature comes also within this definition,
and is, therefore, the nearest analogue to the formation of cells.
Let us now compare the two processes, that the difference of the
organic process may be clearly manifest. First, with reference to the
plastic phenomena, the forms of cells and crystals are very different.
The primary forms of crystals are simple, always angular, and bounded
by plane surfaces; they are regular, or at least symmetrical, and
even the very varied secondary forms of crystals are almost, without
exception, bounded by plane surfaces. But manifold as is the form of
cells, they have very little resemblance to crystals; round surfaces
predominate, and where angles occur, they are never quite sharp, and
the polyhedral crystal-like form of many cells results only from
mechanical causes. The structure too of cells and of crystals is
different. Crystals are solid bodies, composed merely of layers placed
one upon another; cells are hollow vesicles, either single, or several
inclosed one within another. And if we regard the membranes of these
vesicles as layers, there will still remain marks of difference between
them and crystals; these layers are not in contact, but contain fluid
between them, which is not the case with crystals; the layers in the
cells are few, from one to three only; and they differ from each
other in chemical properties, while those of crystals consist of the
same chemical substance. Lastly, there is also a great difference
between crystals and cells in their mode of growth. Crystals grow by
apposition, the new molecules are set only upon the surface of those
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account