Classics of modern science : $b (Copernicus to Pasteur)
History
Classics of modern science : $b (Copernicus to Pasteur)
Science; Science -- History
already deposited, but cells increase also by intussusception, that
is to say, the new molecules are deposited also between those already
present.
But greatly as these plastic phenomena differ in cells and in crystals,
the metabolic are yet more different, or rather they are quite peculiar
to cells. For a crystal to grow, it must be already present as such in
the solution, and some extraneous cause must interpose to diminish its
solubility. Cells, on the contrary, are capable of producing a chemical
change in the surrounding fluid, of generating matters which had not
previously existed in it as such, but of which only the elements were
present in another combination. They therefore require no extraneous
influence to effect a change of solubility; for if they can produce
chemical changes in the surrounding fluid, they may also produce
such substances as could not be held in solution under the existing
circumstances, and therefore need no external cause of growth. If a
crystal be laid in a pretty strong solution, of a substance similar
even to itself, nothing ensues without our interference, or the crystal
dissolves completely: the fluid must be evaporated for the crystal
to increase. If a cell be laid in a solution of a substance, even
different from itself, it grows and converts this substance without
our aid. And this it is from which the process going on in the cells
(so long as we do not separate it into its several acts) obtains that
magical character, to which attaches the idea of Life.
From this we perceive how very different are the phenomena in the
formation of cells and of crystals. Meanwhile, however, the points
of resemblance between them should not be overlooked. They agree in
this important point, that solid bodies of a certain regular shape are
formed in obedience to definite laws at the expense of a substance
contained in solution in a fluid; and the crystal, like the cell, is
so far an active and positive agent as to cause the substances which
are precipitated to be deposited on itself, and nowhere else. We
must, therefore, attribute to it as well as to the cell a power to
attract the substance held in solution in the surrounding fluid. It
does not indeed follow that these two attractive powers, the power of
crystallization--to give it a brief title--and the plastic power of the
cells, are essentially the same. This could only be admitted, if it
were proved that both powers acted according to the same laws. But this
is seen at the first glance to be by no means the case: the phenomena
in the formation of cells and crystals, are, as we have observed, very
different, even if we regard merely the plastic phenomena of the cells,
and leave their metabolic power (which may possibly arise from some
other peculiarity of organic substance) for a time entirely out of the
question.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account