Classics of modern science : $b (Copernicus to Pasteur)
History
Classics of modern science : $b (Copernicus to Pasteur)
Science; Science -- History
As it has been already shown that the earth has the form of a sphere,
we must consider whether a movement also coincides with this form, and
what place the earth holds in the universe. Without this there will be
no secure results to be obtained in regard to the heavenly phenomena.
The great majority of authors of course agree that the earth stands
still in the center of the universe, and consider it inconceivable and
ridiculous to suppose the opposite. But if the matter is carefully
weighed it will be seen that the question is not yet settled and
therefore by no means to be regarded lightly. Every change of place
which is observed is due, namely, to a movement of the observed object
or of the observer, or to movements of both, naturally in different
directions, for if the observed object and the observer move in the
same manner and in the same direction no movement will be seen. Now it
is from the earth that the revolution of the heavens is observed and it
is produced for our eyes. Therefore if the earth undergoes no movement
this movement must take place in everything outside of the earth, but
in the opposite direction than if everything on the earth moved, and
of this kind is the daily revolution. So this appears to affect the
whole universe, that is, everything outside the earth with the single
exception of the earth itself. If, however, one should admit that this
movement was not peculiar to the heavens, but that the earth revolved
from west to east, and if this was carefully considered in regard to
the apparent rising and setting of the sun, the moon and the stars,
it would be discovered that this was the real situation. Since the
sky, which contains and shelters all things, is the common seat of all
things, it is not easy to understand why motion should not be ascribed
rather to the thing contained than to the containing, to the located
rather than to the location. From this supposition follows another
question of no less importance, concerning the place of the earth,
although it has been accepted and believed by almost all, that the
earth occupies the middle of the universe. But if one should suppose
that the earth is not at the center of the universe, that, however,
the distance between the two is not great enough to be measured on the
orbits of the fixed stars, but would be noticeable and perceptible on
the orbit of the sun or of the planets: and if one was further of the
opinion that the movements of the planets appeared to be irregular
as if they were governed by a center other than the earth, then such
an one could perhaps have given the true reasons for the apparently
irregular movement. For since the planets appear now nearer and now
farther from the earth, this shows necessarily that the center of their
revolutions is not the center of the earth: although it does not settle
whether the earth increases and decreases the distance from them or
they their distance from the earth.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account