Classics of modern science : $b (Copernicus to Pasteur)
History
Classics of modern science : $b (Copernicus to Pasteur)
Science; Science -- History
Those alternative currents are a sort of electrical oscillation. Are
they longitudinal, like those of sound, or are they transversal, like
those of Fresnal’s ether? In the case of sound the air undergoes
alternative condensations and rarefactions. The ether of Fresnal, on
the other hand, behaves as if it were composed of incompressible layers
capable only of slipping over one another. Were these currents in open
paths, the electricity carried from one end to the other would become
accumulated at one extremity. It would thus be condensed and rarefied
like air, and its vibrations would be longitudinal. But Maxwell only
admits currents in closed circuits; accumulation is impossible, and
electricity behaves like the incomprehensible ether of Fresnel, with
its transversal vibrations.
EXPERIMENTAL VERIFICATION
We thus obtain all the results of the theory of waves. Yet this was not
enough to decide the physicists to adopt the ideas of Maxwell. It was a
seductive hypothesis; but physicists consider hypotheses which lead to
no distinct observational consequences as beyond the borders of their
province. That province, so defined, no experimental confirmation of
Maxwell’s theory invaded for twenty-five years.
What was wanted was some issue between the two theories not too
delicate for our coarse methods of observation to decide. There was but
one line of research along which any _experimentum crucis_ was to
be met with.
The old electro-dynamics makes electro-magnetic induction take place
instantaneously; but according to Maxwell’s doctrine it propagates
itself with the velocity of light.
The point was then to measure, or at least to make certain, a velocity
of propagation of inductive effects. This is what the illustrious
German physicist Hertz has done by the method of interferences.
The method is well known in its application to optical phenomena. Two
luminous rays from one identical center interfere when they reach the
same point after pursuing paths of different lengths. If the difference
is one, two, or any whole number of wave lengths, the two lights
re-enforce one another so that if their intensities are equal, that of
their combination is four times as great. But if the difference is an
odd number of half wave lengths, the two lights extinguish one another.
Luminiferous waves are not peculiar in showing this phenomenon;
it belongs to every periodic change which is propagated with
definite velocity. Sound interferes just as light does, and so must
electro-dynamic induction if it is strictly periodic and has a definite
velocity of propagation. But if the propagation is instantaneous there
can be no interference, since in that case there is no finite wave
length.
The phenomenon, however, could not be observed were the wave length
greater than the distance within which induction is sensible. It is
therefore requisite to make the period of alternation as short as
possible.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account