EXAMINATION OF THE GRAVITATION THEORY OF OCEANIC
CIRCULATION.—DR. CARPENTER’S THEORY.
Gulf-stream according to Dr. Carpenter not due to Difference of
Specific Gravity.—Facts to be Explained.—The Explanation of
the Facts.—The Explanation hypothetical.—The Cause assigned
for the hypothetical Mode of Circulation.—Under Currents
account for all the Facts better than the Gravitation
Hypothesis.—Known Condition of the Ocean inconsistent with
that Hypothesis 122
CHAPTER IX.
EXAMINATION OF THE GRAVITATION THEORY OF OCEANIC
CIRCULATION.—THE MECHANICS OF DR. CARPENTER’S THEORY.
Experimental Illustration of the Theory.—The Force exerted by
Gravity.—Work performed by Gravity.—Circulation not by
Convection.—Circulation depends on Difference in Density
of the Equatorial and Polar Columns.—Absolute Amount of
Work which can be performed by Gravity.—How Underflow is
produced.—How Vertical Descent at the Poles and Ascent at
the Equator is produced.—The Gibraltar Current.—Mistake in
Mechanics concerning it.—The Baltic Current 145
CHAPTER X.
EXAMINATION OF THE GRAVITATION THEORY OF OCEANIC
CIRCULATION.—DR. CARPENTER’S THEORY.—OBJECTIONS CONSIDERED.
_Modus Operandi_ of the Matter.—Polar Cold considered by Dr.
Carpenter the _Primum Mobile_.—Supposed Influence of
Heat derived from the Earth’s Crust.—Circulation without
Difference of Level.—A Confusion of Ideas in Reference to the
supposed Agency of Polar Cold.—M. Dubuat’s Experiments.—A
Begging of the Question at Issue.—Pressure as a Cause of
Circulation 172
CHAPTER XI.
THE INADEQUACY OF THE GRAVITATION THEORY PROVED BY ANOTHER
METHOD.
Quantity of Heat which can be conveyed by the General Oceanic
Circulation trifling.—Tendency in the Advocates of the
Gravitation Theory to under-estimate the Volume of the
Gulf-stream.—Volume of the Stream as determined by the
_Challenger_.—Immense Volume of Warm Water discovered by
Captain Nares.—Condition of North Atlantic inconsistent with
the Gravitation Theory.—Dr. Carpenter’s Estimate of the
Thermal Work of the Gulf-stream 191
CHAPTER XII.
MR. A. G. FINDLAY’S OBJECTIONS CONSIDERED.
Mr. Findlay’s Estimate of the Volume of the Gulf-stream.—Mean
Temperature of a Cross Section less than Mean Temperature
of Stream.—Reason of such Diversity of Opinion regarding
Ocean-currents.—More rigid Method of Investigation necessary 203
CHAPTER XIII.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account