The cyclone cumulus does not differ in any essential from the clouds
of calm weather. The only difference is that the uprising currents are
perhaps partly eddies, and the rate of fall of temperature with ascent
is often more rapid.
Given any mass of air at a particular temperature, it can take up and
hold in the form of invisible vapour a fixed quantity of water, and no
more. When it holds the maximum possible it is said to be saturated. If
it is nearly saturated it would be called damp; if far from saturated,
dry. Now, the warmer the air the larger the quantity of vapour
necessary to saturate it, so that if a quantity is saturated at a high
temperature, and is then cooled, it will no longer be able to retain
all its moisture in the invisible form, but the surplus quantity will
make its appearance as liquid particles, that is to say, as mist or
cloud.
Similarly, if a quantity of air is not fully saturated at its
particular temperature, and is then cooled, it will approach nearer and
nearer to saturation, and if the process is continued long enough the
result will be cloud formation.
All clouds, without exception, are produced by exactly such cooling
of air containing water vapour, first to the temperature at which the
quantity it contains is the maximum possible, and then beyond that
point. Now, if we start with very warm air, and cool it 1 degree, we
decrease its vapour-holding power, and the decrease per degree grows
less and less as the temperature falls. Suppose, for instance, we have
air saturated at 61 degrees and cool it to 60 degrees, the quantity
of vapour condensed will be equal to the difference of holding power.
Suppose, again, we have air saturated at 31 degrees and we cool it to
30 degrees, the quantity of vapour condensed will again be equal to the
difference of holding power; but this quantity will be very greatly
less than in the former case. Cooling air saturated at 61 degrees to 60
degrees might produce a dense cloud; but applying a similar reduction
of 1 degree to air saturated at 31 degrees, if we take the same volume
of air, will only produce a very much thinner result. Here we see one
good reason why the highest clouds are the thinnest and the alto clouds
of intermediate density.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account