If a quantity of air exists under a certain pressure and at a certain
temperature, on reducing the pressure it will expand, and in the act of
expanding it will become cooler. This may easily be illustrated with
an air-pump. Let a damp sponge or a piece of wet blotting-paper stand
under a glass receiver over an air-pump until the air has become damp.
If the apparatus is in a darkened room, and a powerful beam of light
from a lantern is sent through the receiver, the damp air will be seen
to be quite clear; but a stroke or two of the pump removes some of the
air, the remainder is chilled by its own expansion, and a dense cloud
is precipitated. If this cloud be viewed closely, it will be seen to
be composed of minute particles, which, on looking towards the light,
glow with the colours of a corona. In a few minutes the cloud will
disappear, but it can be recalled again and again by successive strokes
of the pump, getting thinner and thinner as the air gets more and more
rarefied; an illustration of a second reason why the high clouds are
thinner than the lower.
Some years ago Mr. John Aitken showed that if the damp air used in
this experiment were carefully filtered, so as to remove all foreign
particles, no cloud was produced, and the introduction of a puff of
unfiltered air was attended by immediate condensation. The deduction
was that vapour, even below its saturation temperature, cannot produce
cloud unless nuclei of some sort are already present, presumably dust
particles. Later on it was shown by Mr. Shelford Bidwell and others
that gaseous particles, such as those produced by the burning of
sulphur, would serve the purpose, and that the brush discharge from an
electrified point was in some mysterious way particularly effective.
It has recently been shown by Mr. C. T. R. Wilson that causes such as
the radiations of radium, or the impact of ultra-violet rays, acting on
the air itself, splits up some of its particles into the smaller bodies
known as ions, and that these are efficient nuclei. These experiments
open up many most interesting questions, but, unless it is to explain
the extreme density and darkness of a thunder-cloud, they do not seem
to play any important part in determining the forms to be assumed.
Nuclei in sufficient abundance are probably always present at any
height which can be reached by enough vapour to form a cloud.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account