Christian fiction; Conduct of life -- Fiction; Didactic fiction; Mate selection -- Fiction
I saw and admired the pictures. The pictures brought on an invitation to
dinner. I found Mrs. Fentham to be in her conversation, a sensible,
correct, knowing woman. Her daughters were elegant in their figures,
well instructed in the usual accomplishments, well-bred, and apparently
well tempered. Mr. Fentham was a man of business, and of the world. He
had a great income from a place under government, out of which the
expenses of his family permitted him to save nothing. Private fortune he
had little or none. His employment engaged him almost entirely, so that
he interfered but little with domestic affairs. A general air of
elegance, almost amounting to magnificence, pervaded the whole
establishment.
I at first saw but little to excite any suspicion of the artificial
character of the lady of the house. The first gleam of light which let
in the truth was the expressions most frequent in Mrs. Fentham's
mouth--"What will the world say?" "What will people think?" "How will
such a thing appear?" "Will it have a good look?" "The world is of
opinion." "Won't such a thing be censured?" On a little acquaintance I
discovered that human applause was the motive of all she said, and
reputation her great object in all she did. Opinion was the idol to
which she sacrificed. Decorum was the inspirer of her duties, and praise
the reward of them. The standard of the world was the standard by which
she weighed actions. She had no higher principle of conduct. She adopted
the forms of religion, because she saw that, carried to a certain
degree, they rather produced credit than censure. While her husband
adjusted his accounts on the Sunday morning, she regularly carried her
daughters to church, except a head-ache had been caught at the
Saturday's opera; and as regularly exhibited herself and them afterward
in Hyde-Park. As she said it was Mr. Fentham's leisure day, she
complimented him with always having a great dinner on Sundays, but
alleged her piety as a reason for not having cards in the evening at
home, though she had no scruple to make one at a private party at a
friend's house; soberly conditioning, however, that there should not be
more than _three tables_; the right or wrong, the decorum or
impropriety, the gayety or gravity always being made specifically to
depend on the number of tables.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account