Colour vision : $b Being the Tyndall Lectures delivered in 1894 at the Royal Institution — John Shaqi
Colour vision : $b Being the Tyndall Lectures delivered in 1894 at the Royal InstitutionAbney, William de Wiveleslie, Sir
Science
Colour vision : $b Being the Tyndall Lectures delivered in 1894 at the Royal Institution
Abney, William de Wiveleslie, Sir
Color vision
With this instrument it is easy to demonstrate that a mixed colour
may be mistaken for a simple colour of the spectrum. In a glass cell
with parallel sides is a solution of potassium bichromate, which,
to myself and probably most of you, has a beautiful orange colour.
The spectrum of white light is now on the screen, and if this orange
liquid is placed in the path of the white light before it reaches
the prisms, all the violet, blue, and most of the green is cut off,
leaving some green-yellow, orange and red only on the screen. That
these form the orange colour of the bichromate is readily shown by
removing the auxiliary lens. The spectrum, which has its focus at D, is
now recombined into a patch of light, which is at once seen to be the
colour of the solution.
[Illustration: FIG. 6.]
The colour of the bichromate is therefore a complex or mixed colour
according to our definition, for it is made up of a large number of
simple colours. What I desire to show, however, is that this complex
colour can be mistaken by the eye for a simple colour. First, let us
interpose the cell with the bichromate in the path of the _reflected_
beam, and throw the patch of light formed by it on a white surface A
(Fig. 6), alongside the patch of light B formed by the spectrum. Next
let us pass a single aperture (Fig. 7), which can be opened and closed
by a screw arrangement, through the spectrum. By careful movement we at
length come to an orange ray, which is spread out by the apparatus to
form a patch on B, that to the majority (and the word majority is used
with intention) of people exactly matches the colour of the bichromate.
Thus we have a proof that, as far as the eye is concerned, the simple
and the complex colours are identical. This illustration of the want
of power of the eye to analyse colour might be repeated as often as
we like. We may pass coloured wools, for instance, through the length
of the spectrum and show that they have the property of appearing
bright in, and therefore of reflecting, some colours and of almost
disappearing in others--a sure indication that these colours are mixed
colours as they are made up of the rays which are reflected. Yet when
viewed in white light they can in many cases be matched with simple
colours in the way we matched the colour of the bichromate solution.
This tells us that there is something which requires investigating as
to the constitution of the perceiving apparatus, and points to the
probability that it is less complicated than it would be were it able
to differentiate, without the aid of the spectrum, between simple
and complex colours. If the eye had a separate apparatus--and when I
say apparatus I use the word for want of a better--for taking up the
impression of every simple colour, it might well be assumed that a
differentiation must take place.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account