Colour vision : $b Being the Tyndall Lectures delivered in 1894 at the Royal Institution — John Shaqi
Colour vision : $b Being the Tyndall Lectures delivered in 1894 at the Royal InstitutionAbney, William de Wiveleslie, Sir
Science
Colour vision : $b Being the Tyndall Lectures delivered in 1894 at the Royal Institution
Abney, William de Wiveleslie, Sir
Color vision
In former days, not much more than a century ago, the existence of
colour blindness, as it is now named, was a matter of great curiosity,
and in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of 1777,
the case of a shoemaker named Harris is described by a Mr. Huddart,
who travelled all the way from London to the Midlands on purpose to
see if all the alleged facts regarding the patient were true. Harris
mistook orange for green, brown he called black, and he was unable to
distinguish between red fruits and the surrounding green leaves. At
first, colour blindness was called Daltonism, from the fact that the
great chemist Dalton suffered from it, and investigated the variation
which he found existed in his vision from that of the majority of his
fellow-creatures. It was in 1794 that Dalton described his own case of
colour blindness. He was quite unaware of his defect till 1792, when he
was convinced of its existence from his observations of a pink geranium
by candle-light. “The flower,” he says, “was pink; but it appeared to
me almost an exact sky-blue by day. In candle-light, however, it was
astonishingly changed, not having any blue in it; but being what I
call a red colour which forms a striking contrast to blue.” He goes
on to remark that all his friends except his _brother_ (mark this
relationship), said: there was not any striking difference in the
two colours by the two lights. He then investigated his case by the
solar spectrum, and became convinced that instead of having the normal
sensations, he only had two or at most three. These were yellow, blue,
and perhaps purple. In yellow, he included the red, orange, yellow,
and green of others, and his blue and purple coincided with theirs.
He says, that “part of the image which others call red, appears to me
little more than a shade or defect of light; after that, the orange,
yellow and green seem _one_ colour, which descends pretty uniformly
from an intense and a rare yellow, making what I should call different
shades of yellow. The difference between the green part and the blue
part is very striking to my eye, they seem to be strongly contrasted.
That between the blue and purple much less so. The purple appears to be
blue much darkened and condensed.”
Dalton said a florid complexion looked blackish-blue on a white ground.
Blood looked like bottle green, grass appeared very little different
from red. A laurel leaf was a good match to a stick of sealing-wax.
Colours appeared to him much the same by moonlight as they did by
candle-light. By the electric light and lightning, they appeared as in
day light. Some browns he called red, and others black.
Mr. Babbage, in Scientific London (1874), gives an account of Dalton’s
presentation at Court.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account