Colour vision : $b Being the Tyndall Lectures delivered in 1894 at the Royal InstitutionAbney, William de Wiveleslie, Sir
Science
Colour vision : $b Being the Tyndall Lectures delivered in 1894 at the Royal Institution
Abney, William de Wiveleslie, Sir
Color vision
An endeavour was made to form a series of colour equations with her
eyesight by placing three slits in different parts of the spectrum, but
without success, although a match with white was made in two positions.
One slit was in the orange-red (52 of the scale), another at E, and the
third at G; mixtures were made which she said matched the white, but
they were so erratic that it was useless to measure the apertures. When
the slit in the violet was covered up, a white patch being alongside as
a comparison, she called the mixture of red and green “brownish-green”;
when the slit in the red was covered she called the mixed light of
green and violet “green”; and when the green slit was covered up she
called the purple colour a “different kind of brown.”
When the first slit was moved into the red near the lithium line she
called the colours “green,” whenever the green slit was uncovered. A
piece of red glass was placed in the white reflected beam, forming
a red patch, and a patch of the blue at scale No. 30·5 (λ 4862) was
placed alongside, and she matched them in luminosity and in colour.
(The dominant colour of the signal glass in question was λ 6220.) She
finally was tested with colour discs.
To make white she required
130 G + 113 R + 117 U = 72 W + 218 B.
She was then tried with the blue and green discs alone and made a
match--
258 U + 102 G = 65 W + 295 B.
An attempt was made to match with the green and red discs alone, but
this failed.
She matched the red disc alone with black and white, and also the blue
disc alone--
360 R = 56 W + 304 B (corrected),
360 U = 60 W + 300 B (corrected).
With any proportion of R and U mixed together she matched a grey of
approximately the same intensity as above, as it might be supposed she
would from the last two equations.
Taking the intensity curve of the light reflected from the red disc, it
was found to contain a great deal of the part of the spectrum which she
called brownish, viz., from 33·5 to 48 on the scale, whereas the blue
reflected a trifle of this portion of the spectrum, as did also the
green; and this may account for her making a match to grey of U and G,
and not of R and G, but it is hard to see why she matched U alone and
also R with the grey.
Reviewing the case, it seems that any perception of colour is very
small, and that the sensations are green and much less red. From the
equations it also seems that she would have matched green with white
and black alone, and that 360 G = 75 W + 285 B. Perhaps the explanation
of the matches and names of colours may be that a proportion of colour
may be mixed with another without being perceived, but this colour so
hidden has still the capability of neutralising a certain quantity of
the complementary colour.
CHAPTER XIII.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account