Commentaries on the Surgery of the War in Portugal, Spain, France, and the Netherlands: from the battle of Roliça, in 1808, to that of Waterloo, in 1815; with additions relating to those in the Crimea in 1854-55, showing the improvements made during and since that period in the great art and science of surgery on all the subjects to which they relate.Guthrie, G. J. (George James)
History
Commentaries on the Surgery of the War in Portugal, Spain, France, and the Netherlands: from the battle of Roliça, in 1808, to that of Waterloo, in 1815; with additions relating to those in the Crimea in 1854-55, showing the improvements made during and since that period in the great art and science of surgery on all the subjects to which they relate.
Guthrie, G. J. (George James)
Crimean War, 1853-1856 -- Medical care; Napoleonic Wars, 1800-1815 -- Medical care; Surgery, Military -- Europe -- History; War wounds -- Europe -- History
scratch of the leg from a musket-ball, more frequently than from a
greater injury, are not surprised at any symptoms of nervous agitation
that may occur after punctured wounds. As many bayonet wounds through
muscular parts heal with little trouble, it is time enough to dilate
them when assistance seems to be required. Cold water should be used at
first; care should be taken not to apply a roller or compress of any
kind over the wound; matter, when formed, should be frequently pressed
out, and, if necessary, a free exit should be made for it.
23. A great delusion is cherished in Great Britain on the subject
of the bayonet--a sort of monomania very gratifying to the national
vanity, but not quite in accordance with matter of fact. Opposing
regiments, when formed in line, and charging with fixed bayonets, never
meet and struggle hand to hand and foot to foot, and this for the very
best possible reason, that one side turns round and runs away as soon
as the other comes close enough to do mischief; doubtless considering
that discretion is the better part of valor. Small parties of men may
have personal conflicts after an affair has been decided, or in the
subsequent scuffle if they cannot get out of the way fast enough.
The battle of Maida is usually referred to as a remarkable instance
of a bayonet fight; nevertheless, the sufferers, whether killed or
wounded, French or English, suffered from bullets, not bayonets. The
late Sir James Kempt commanded the brigade supposed to have done this
feat, but he has assured me that no charge with the bayonet took
place, the French being killed in line by the fire of musketry; a fact
which has of late received a remarkable confirmation in the published
correspondence of King Joseph Bonaparte, in which General Regnier,
writing to him on the subject, says: “The 1st and 42d Regiments charged
with the bayonet until they came within fifteen paces of the enemy,
when they turned, _et prirent la fuite_. The second line, composed of
Polish troops, had already done the same.” Wounds from bayonets were
not less rare in the Peninsular war. It may be that all those who were
bayoneted were killed, yet their bodies were seldom found. A certain
fighting regiment had the misfortune one very misty morning to have a
large number of men carried off by a charge of Polish lancers, many
being also killed. The commanding officer concluded they must be all
killed, for his men possessed exactly the same spirit as a part of the
French Imperial guard at Waterloo. “They might be killed, but they
could not by any possibility be taken prisoners.” He returned them
all dead accordingly. A few days afterward they reappeared, to the
astonishment of everybody, having been swept off by the cavalry, and
had made their escape in the retreat of the French army through the
woods. The regiment from that day obtained the ludicrous name of the
“Resurrection men.”
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account