Common Cause: A Novel of the War in AmericaAdams, Samuel Hopkins
General
Common Cause: A Novel of the War in America
Adams, Samuel Hopkins
World War, 1914-1918 -- United States -- Fiction
MIGHTY was the clash of political lances, that spring of 1916, in
Fenchester. Senate and Assembly alike rang with noble phrases and high
sentiments. The mortal agony of a world across the seas, locked in a
conflict which should determine the future of civilization, became a
quite unimportant matter to those embattled souls on the hill. Let outer
and lesser history take its course; it was theirs to decide whether the
State of Centralia should or should not thenceforth emancipate itself
from the rule of its former and uncrowned dictators. From the front
pages of the local press, a committee vote was likely to evict an
Italian battle, or an interview with Montrose Clark or ‘Governor Embree
take precedence over a peace-hint from Baron Burian. All of which meant,
if you read The Record, that the radical and socialistic element were
undertaking to slay the fairy-babe, Blanket Franchise, and substitute
the horrid changeling, Corporation Control; whereas, if you pinned your
faith to The Guardian, it indicated the final struggle of an oppressed
people to writhe out from beneath the heel of a conscienceless,
tyranny of dollars. Amidst all this sound and fury Judge Selden Dana’s
candidacy, signifying much but saying little, was pressed. Only one
reference had the Judge made to Jeremy’s warning about his past record.
“Remember that libel is criminal as well as civil, my young friend.”
To which Jeremy replied cheerfully: “Let us know when your formal
announcement is made, Judge. We’ll give you a good show.”
“Agreed,” said the lawyer. “And I’ll give you some advertising, too.
I’ve got to convert some of your deluded followers.”
Already the advertising campaign of the P.-U. was in full swing. Part
of it had been offered to The Guardian, in spite of Judge Dana’s earlier
threat. That had been partly bluff. The astute politician knew that
an element, not otherwise attainable, could be reached with argument
through the radical paper. Only with great difficulty had he persuaded
Montrose Clark to this view. Said the public utilitarian, reluctantly
according his assent: “I haven’t forgotten that that cub accused us of
playing the Germans against his paper. I gave him the lie.”
Judge Dana, who knew far more about the Deutscher Club’s internal
operations than he cared to have his principal realize, passed this
observation with a non-committal smile.
“I’m going to advertise my own candidacy there,” he pursued. “To get
converts you’ve got to go after the other side.”
After having prevailed upon the public utilitarian to adopt his view,
Judge Dana was chagrined at having the proffered advertisements rejected
by the owner of The Guardian.
“But why?” he demanded, his sleepy eyes lifted to Jeremy’s with a candid
and injured expression.
“You want too much. I remember your learned and able argument as to
editorial forbearance toward advertisers, Brother Dana.”
The lawyer shifted his ground. “Is it fair to deny the other side a
hearing?”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account