Companion to the BibleBarrows, E. P. (Elijah Porter)
Religion
Companion to the Bible
Barrows, E. P. (Elijah Porter)
Bible -- Study and teaching
1. The province of _Particular Introduction_ is to consider the books of
the Bible separately, in respect to their authorship, date, contents,
and the place which each of them holds in the system of divine truth.
Here it is above all things important that we begin with the idea of the
_unity of divine revelation_--that all the parts of the Bible constitute
a gloriously perfect whole, of which God and not man is the author. No
amount of study devoted to a given book or section of the Old Testament,
with all the help that modern scholarship can furnish, will give a true
comprehension of it, until we understand it in its relations to the rest
of Scripture, We cannot, for example, understand the book of Genesis out
of connection with the four books that follow, nor the book of
Deuteronomy separated from the four that precede. Nor can we fully
understand the Pentateuch as a whole except in the light of the
historical and prophetical books which follow; for these unfold the
divine purpose in the establishment of the Theocracy as recorded in the
Pentateuch. The Pentateuch itself gives us only the _constitution_ of
the Theocracy. The books that follow, taken in connection with, the New
Testament, reveal its _office_ in the plan of redemption; and not till
we know this can we be said to have an intelligent comprehension of the
theocratic system. The same is true of every other part of revelation.
The words of the apostle: "Ever learning, and never able to come
to the knowledge of the truth" (2 Tim. 3:7), apply to many
learned commentaries. Their authors have brought to them much
accurate scholarship and research; but they have not seen the
unity of divine truth. They have written mainly in an
antiquarian spirit and interest, regarding the work under
consideration simply as an ancient and venerable record. They
have diligently sought for connections in philology, in
antiquities, and in history. In these respects they have thrown
much light on the sacred text. But they have never once thought
of inquiring what place the book which they have undertaken to
interpret holds in the divine system of revelation--perhaps have
had no faith in such a system. Consequently they cannot unfold
to others that which they do not themselves apprehend. On a
hundred particulars they may give valuable information, but that
which constitutes the very life and substance of the book
remains hidden from their view.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account