The highlands are generally met with in the interior of the continents;
the lowlands at the coasts. Yet there are exceptions to this.
In the transitions from lowlands to highlands there is great diversity.
We can speak of three distinct bases of discrimination: a sudden
and abrupt ascent; a rise in elevation so gradual as scarcely to be
perceived; and a terrace formation. Yet in these there is a blending of
one variety with another; there is no place sharply marked, where we can
say that one form ends and another begins. There are constantly found
modifications of these three transitional phases. The plains along the
Indus and the Ganges rise sharply to the plateaus of Thibet The flat
Pacific coast of South America is exchanged with equal abruptness for
the highlands of Peru. The transition is a gradual one from the lowlands
of North Germany, along the Baltic and the North Sea, through Saxony
and Bohemia to the Bavarian highlands, north of the Alps. The Spanish
highlands form a series of terraces, increasing in height from south to
north. The immense plateaus of central Asia are also terrace formations,
of diminishing elevation, as they advance to Siberia; so, too, are the
eastern plateaus of Peru, falling off in altitude toward the plains of
the Amazon.
Just as varied are the heights taken from the sea level of the leading
plateaus. Yet they never rise to a point of elevation comparable
with those of isolated mountain peaks or ranges. These attain, in no
insignificant numbers, the height of 24,000 feet, while some ascend
thousands of feet beyond that. In Mount Everest, of the Himalaya chain,
the loftiest summit yet measured (29,000 feet) is found; although it may
be that future investigations more to the south will disclose yet greater
heights.
Highlands.
Continuous highlands or plateaus seldom attain an elevation greater
than a half or a third of the loftiest mountains; the most elevated
range in altitude, from 8000 to 12,000 feet above the sea level. On an
average, they lie about 4000 to 5000 feet above the sea. We take the last
height as a convenient point of demarkation between the two classes of
highlands—those of the first and those of the second magnitude. It is an
arbitrary point, of course, and the division there must remain, without
a natural base to rest upon, till more results in Hypsometry shall have
determined the real point of average between the combined lowlands and
the combined highlands of the earth’s surface. Meantime this division
will be of great service to us in enabling us to bring into a definite
and appreciable classification many facts which would otherwise not be so
well understood in their relations.
_Highlands or Plateaus of the First Class._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account