Comparison of Methods of Sewage PurificationPhillips, Theodore Clifford
Science
Comparison of Methods of Sewage Purification
Phillips, Theodore Clifford
Sewage -- Purification
Produced by Richard Tonsing and the Online Distributed
Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This file was
produced from images generously made available by The
Internet Archive)
COMPARISON OF METHODS
OF
SEWAGE PURIFICATION
BY
THEODORE CLIFFORD PHILLIPS
AND
EDWARD JOHN SCHNEIDER
THESIS
FOR DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF SCIENCE
IN MUNICIPAL AND SANITARY ENGINEERING
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS
PRESENTED JUNE 1900
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS
_May 31, 1900._
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE THESIS PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION BY
_Theodore Clifford Phillips and Edward John Schneider_ ENTITLED
_Comparison of Methods of Sewage Purification_ IS APPROVED BY ME AS
FULFILLING THIS PART OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF _Bachelor of
Science in Municipal and Sanitary Engineering_.
_Arthur M. Talbot_
HEAD OF DEPARTMENT OF _Municipal and Sanitary Engineering_.
_Contents_
Comparison of Methods of Sewage Purification
Dilution
Irrigation
Intermittent Downward Filtration
Chemical Precipitation
Septic Tank
Contact Bed
Discussion
Conclusion
_Comparison of Methods of Sewage Purification._
The disposal of sewage is one of the most important problems that
confront the municipal and sanitary engineer to-day.
The study of this subject dates back to 1844 when the Healths of Towns
Commission of London made the report which first showed the real course
of the rapid increase in the death rate of the larger cities. In this
country practically nothing was done until 1872 when the Massachusetts
Legislature instructed the State Board of Health to investigate and
report on the subjects of sewerage, sewage disposal, and the pollution
of streams, and to-day Massachusetts leads in the investigation of the
best methods of sewage disposal.
Six different methods for the treatment of sewage are now in use. These
methods are used separately or in combination, the choice depending upon
local conditions and the amount of purification required:—
These methods are:
1— Dilution.
2— Irrigation.
3— Intermittent Downward Filtration.
4— Chemical Precipitation.
5— Septic Tank.
6— Contact Bed.
The purpose of this thesis is to investigate each method and make a
comparison along the following lines:
1— Purification.
2— Capacity.
3— Applicability.
4— Cost.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account