Consistency is a delicate word to political ears. Lest any misunderstanding should arise, or any member of the legislature should conceive himself shackled by former votes, it was necessary to explain fully to which side the charge attaches of having abandoned former principles. Having therefore removed that injurious bias which it appears to be the object of the advocate of the Colonial Department to raise against the West Indians, on the ground of inconsistency, it now becomes desirable to discuss the principle of compulsory manumission on its own merits. It will be found that the opposition of the West Indians is not directed against an imaginary evil; that opposition now is very different from those minor objections locally entertained against particular plans of amelioration; and that, above all, if government, with a view of courting popular favour, have innovated upon their original understanding with the West Indian party, they have neither chosen the most benevolent nor the wisest mode to accomplish their own end of terminating slavery. We propose to pursue the examination upon the grounds marked out by the Parliamentary Resolutions already quoted, in the order in which the importance of the several heads may be presumed to receive attention from a legislative assembly. 1. Justice, as regards the right of property. 2. Humanity, as regards the well-being of the negroes. 3. Sound Policy, as regards the safety of the Colonies. CHAPTER III. INFRINGEMENT OF THE RIGHT OF PROPERTY. Loss of property may be brought upon the Proprietor of a West India estate in two ways: First, By introducing a new tone of feeling among the Negroes, and converting good servants into bad. Secondly, By abstracting such a number of efficient hands from an estate, that the remainder are incompetent to carry on its cultivation in an effective manner, or to render its fixed capital productive. _Section 1._ THE CONVERSION OF GOOD SERVANTS INTO BAD.