Compulsory Vaccination: Report of a Public Meeting, held in the Marylebone Vestry Hall, London, on Wednesday evening, October 19, 1870. — John Shaqi
Compulsory Vaccination: Report of a Public Meeting, held in the Marylebone Vestry Hall, London, on Wednesday evening, October 19, 1870.Marylebone Anti-Compulsory Vaccination League
History
Compulsory Vaccination: Report of a Public Meeting, held in the Marylebone Vestry Hall, London, on Wednesday evening, October 19, 1870.
Marylebone Anti-Compulsory Vaccination League
Smallpox -- Prevention; Vaccination
And now for Ireland, on which so much stress has been laid of late. You
tell us, that vaccination has extinguished small-pox in that country. I
deny it. For while it is quite true that small-pox is absent—this is not
the result of vaccination—for the Registrar General’s returns shew that
there is less vaccination in Ireland than in England, and far less than
in Scotland. You flatter yourselves that _you_ have put out small-pox by
vaccination. In regard to Ireland the fact is, that inoculation has been
clandestinely carried on in that country, the people having more
confidence in the protecting power of small-pox, a disease which is
human, than in vaccination, a disease of a brute. They have this
instinct, and this instinct is right in the mother who shudders at the
idea of _cow_-pox. You overrule this instinct which is natural, with
your reason, you impose a substitute which is revolting. Small-pox is
absent from Ireland, but is the mortality less? No, on the contrary
under the operation of a natural law which I have illustrated in my essay
on vaccination, to which Mr. Snell has alluded, scarlatina has displaced
small-pox, and the general mortality has increased. It is a general rule
that when small-pox is present you have a low mortality, and when it is
absent you have a higher mortality. Small-pox is absent from England,
but look at your frightful mortality from scarlatina. {12} In the last
two years, I estimate the mortality from scarlatina at 40,000 per annum,
and small-pox only 1,500. And what is the nature of this process which
you call _vaccination_. Dr. McOubrey has already told you this evening,
that the disease which Jenner implanted was _not_ natural cow-pox, but a
disease which developed itself in phagædenic ulcerations. You follow Dr.
Blane who advocated vaccination direct from the heifer to avoid the
admitted dangers arising from arm to arm vaccination—the diseases
transplanted therewith. You tell us to-night, that vaccination with
cow-pox will prevent small-pox. Did Jenner tell you this? Let me read
to you his words at page 7 of his work, published in 1798, he cautions
you against trusting to spontaneous cow-pox, lest you should be deceived
into a false security.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account