Conspecificity of two pocket mice, Perognathus goldmani and P. artusHall, E. Raymond (Eugene Raymond)
Science
Conspecificity of two pocket mice, Perognathus goldmani and P. artus
Hall, E. Raymond (Eugene Raymond)
Pocket mice
_Records of occurrence_ (in each state the localities are
listed from north to south).--Sinaloa: 2-1/2 mi. N El
Fuerte, 25 K. U.; Sinaloa (Osgood, N. Amer. Fauna, 18:55,
September 20, 1900); 10 mi. NNW Los Mochis, 18 K. U. Sonora:
1 mi. E Buena Vista, on Rio Yaqui Reservoir, 1000 ft., 2 K.
U.; Camoa, 7 (U. S. N. M.); Tesia (Burt, Miscl. Publ. Mus.
Zool., Univ. Michigan, 39:46, February 15, 1938); Alamos, 7
(U. S. N. M.); 4-1/2 mi. SE Alamos, 1000 ft., 5 K. U.;
Chinobampo (Burt, _loc. cit._); 3 mi. NNW Bacarachi
[= Bacavachi], 2 K. U.
~Perognathus goldmani artus~ Osgood
_Perognathus artus_ Osgood, N. Amer. Fauna, 18:55, September
20, 1900, type from Batopilas, Chihuahua.
_Range._--See map 1.
_Measurements._--Average of five adult topotypes (Osgood,
_op. cit._:55, 63): total length, 191; tail vertebrae, 106;
hind foot, 24.6; occipitonasal length, 25.4; mastoidal
breadth, 12.4; greatest width of interparietal, 7.1.
_Remarks._--Considerable individual variation has been noted in each of
several populations of _Perognathus goldmani artus_. For example, in 14
adults from Culiacan, Sinaloa, the variation is 25.0 to 27.9 in
occipitonasal length and in mastoidal breadth is 12.6 to 14.0. Ten
specimens (83122-83131 Univ. Mich.) labeled as from Carimechi, Rio
Mayo, Chi[huahua], were recorded by Burt and Hooper (Occas. Papers Mus.
Zool., Univ. Michigan, 430:6, May 27, 1941) as from "near Carimechi."
They identified the two largest (83130 and 83131) as _Perognathus
goldmani_ and the others as _Perognathus artus_. These identifications
were reasonable in the light of knowledge available in 1941, but in the
light of information presently available from the now more abundant
material it is clear that all 10 of the specimens are _P. g. artus_.
Examination (by Hall) of the specimens reveals that the differences
relied upon by Burt and Hooper to differentiate the two species are
well within the range of individual variation. For example, the
variation (5.3 to 5.6 mm.) in width of the supraoccipital is less than
in each of some other series of specimens of equal age of _P. g. artus_
from other localities.
Also, there is geographic variation in the mice here assigned to the
subspecies _P. g. artus_; skulls are smaller in the northern part of
the geographic range and become gradually larger toward the south. In
five adults from the northern part (Batopilas 3, and 26 mi. NE Choix 2)
the mean of 12.6 of the mastoidal breadth of the skull is significantly
smaller than the corresponding mean of 13.3 in 21 adults from the
southern part (32 mi. SSE Culiacan 14, and El Dorado 7). The pelage of
individuals from one and a half miles southwest of Tocuina is notably
dark both above and below; the venter is dusky rather than white. We
suppose that the darker color is a response to a dark-colored
substrate--lava and soils derived from dark lava.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account