Constantine the Great: The reorganization of the Empire and the triumph of the ChurchFirth, John B. (John Benjamin)
History
Constantine the Great: The reorganization of the Empire and the triumph of the Church
Firth, John B. (John Benjamin)
Church history -- Primitive and early church, ca. 30-600; Constantine I, Emperor of Rome, -337
Throughout this time the West had escaped very lightly. Even Maxentius
had begun his reign by seeking to secure the good-will of the
Christians. Eusebius, indeed, makes the incredible statement[73] that in
order to please and flatter the Roman people he pretended to embrace the
Christian faith and “assumed the mask of piety.” Probably all he did was
to leave the Christians of Rome in peace. The chair of St. Peter had
remained empty for four years after the death of Bishop Marcellinus. In
308 Marcellus was elected to fill it and the Church was organised
afresh. But it was rent with internal dissensions. There was a large
section which insisted that the brethren who had been found weak during
the recent persecution should be received back into the fold without
penance and reproach. Marcellus stood out for discipline; the quarrel
became so exacerbated that Maxentius exiled the Bishop, who shortly
afterwards died. A priest named Eusebius was then chosen Pontiff, but
the schismatics elected a Pontiff of their own, Heraclius by name, and
the rival partisans quarrelled and fought in the streets. Maxentius,
with strict impartiality, exiled both. The record of this schism is
preserved in the curious epitaph composed by Pope Damasus for the tomb
of Eusebius:
“Heraclius forbade the lapsed to bewail their sins; Eusebius taught
them to repent and weep for their wrong-doing. The people were divided
into factions, raging and furious: then came sedition, bloodshed, war,
discord, strife.[74] Forthwith both were driven away by the cruelty of
the tyrant. While the Bishop preserved intact the bonds of peace, he
endured his exile gladly on the Trinacrian shores, knowing that God
was his judge, and so passed from this world and from life.”
-----
Footnote 73:
_Hist. Eccles._, viii., 14.
Footnote 74:
_Scinditur in partes populus gliscente furore; Seditio, cædes, bellum,
discordia, lites._
-----
On the confession of Damasus himself, the state of the Roman Church
warranted the interference of Maxentius if it resulted in “sedition,
bloodshed, war, discord, and strife,” and the “cruelty of the tyrant” in
this particular case is not proven. Eusebius died in Sicily in 310; in
the following year Miltiades was elected Bishop, and Maxentius restored
to the Roman Christians their churches and cemeteries, which for eight
years had been in the hands of the civil authorities.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account