Constantine the Great: The reorganization of the Empire and the triumph of the ChurchFirth, John B. (John Benjamin)
History
Constantine the Great: The reorganization of the Empire and the triumph of the Church
Firth, John B. (John Benjamin)
Church history -- Primitive and early church, ca. 30-600; Constantine I, Emperor of Rome, -337
The overthrow of Maxentius by Constantine, the destruction of Maximin by
Licinius, the publication of the Edict of Milan, and the apparent
sincerity of the two Emperors in their anxiety to restore peace and
security, were naturally hailed by the Christians throughout the Empire
with the liveliest joy. On every side stately churches began to rise
from the ground, and as the triumph of Christianity over its enemies was
incontestable, converts came flocking in by the thousand to receive what
Eusebius calls “the mysterious signs of the Saviour’s Passion.” The only
troublers of the Church were members of the Church herself, like the
extravagant Donatists in Africa. The canons of the Council of Ancyra,
which was held soon after the death of Maximin, shew how the
ecclesiastical authorities imposed varying penances upon those who had
shrunk from their duty as soldiers of Christ in the recent persecution,
varying, that is to say, according to the extent of their shortcomings.
Some had apostatised and themselves turned persecutors; some had
sacrificed at the first command; some had endured prison, but had shrunk
from torture; some had suffered torture, but quailed before the stake;
some had bribed the executioners only to make a show of torturing them;
some had attended the sacrificial feasts, but had substituted other
meats. The punishments range from ten years of probation and every
degree of penance, down to a few months’ deprivation of the comforts and
communions of the Church.
New dangers, however, speedily threatened. Constantine and Licinius
quarrelled between themselves and, after two stubborn battles, agreed
upon a fresh division of the world. For eight years, from 315 to 323,
this partition lasted, but, as the Emperors again drifted apart,
Licinius became more and more anti-Christian. His rivalry with
Constantine accounts for the change. Licinius suspected Constantine of
intriguing with his Christian subjects just as Constantine regarded the
pagan element in his own provinces as the natural focus of disaffection
against his rule. Licinius had no definite Christian beliefs; he had
been the friend and nominee of Galerius; and, like Galerius, he never
got rid of the suspicion that the Christian assemblies were a danger to
the public security. The Christians had aided him against Maximin: he
thought they would do the same for Constantine against himself.
Eusebius[75] likens him to a twisted snake, wriggling along and
concealing its poisoned fangs, not daring to attack the Church openly
for fear of Constantine, but dealing it constant and insidious blows.
-----
Footnote 75:
_De Vita Constant._, ii., 1.
-----
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account