Constantine the Great: The reorganization of the Empire and the triumph of the ChurchFirth, John B. (John Benjamin)
History
Constantine the Great: The reorganization of the Empire and the triumph of the Church
Firth, John B. (John Benjamin)
Church history -- Primitive and early church, ca. 30-600; Constantine I, Emperor of Rome, -337
The simile was well chosen. Licinius seems to have opened his campaign
against the Christians by forbidding the bishops in his provinces to
leave their dioceses and take part in their usual synods and councils.
They were to remain at home, he said, and mind their own business and
not plot treason against their Emperor under the pretext of perfecting
the discipline of the Church. Another edict, which came with poor grace
from a man whose own excesses were notorious, forbade Christian men and
women to meet for common worship in their churches: they were to worship
apart, so that their morals might not be exposed to danger. On the same
pretext, bishops and priests were only allowed to give teaching and
consolation to their own sex; Christian women must find women teachers
and advisers. Eusebius tells us[76] that these edicts excited universal
ridicule. It was too late to revive the old stories of gross immorality
taking place at the communion services, and there was fresh cause for
mocking laughter when Licinius forbade the Christians to assemble in
their churches within the towns and ordered them to go outside the gates
and meet, if they must meet, in the open air. This was necessary, he
said, on the grounds of public health; the atmosphere beyond the gates
was purer. Licinius’s theory of hygiene was perfectly sound; its
application was ludicrous.
-----
Footnote 76:
_De Vita Constant._, i., 53.
-----
These were the first steps leading, as his subjects must have known only
too well, straight to persecution. After a time Licinius threw over
bodily the Edict of Milan. He purged his court and his army in the old
way. The choice was sacrifice or dismissal, and some pretext was usually
made to tack on to official dismissal a confiscation of goods. Licinius,
says Eusebius, thirsted for gold like a very Tantalus. Aurelius Victor
says[77] he had all the mean, sordid avarice of a peasant. And the
Christians, of course, were fair game. He pillaged their churches,
robbed them of their goods, sentenced them to exile and to the mines, or
ruined them just as effectually by insisting on their becoming
magistrates. Bloodshed followed, and Licinius aimed his severest blows
at the bishops. He accused them of omitting his name in their prayers
for the welfare of the Emperor and the State, though they carefully
remembered that of Constantine; and, if none were actually put to death,
many suffered imprisonment, torture, and mutilation. The story of the
martyrs and confessors in the Licinian persecution is very like that of
those who suffered under Diocletian and Maximin. But the fate of the
forty soldier martyrs of the Twelfth Legion (_Fulminata_) deserves
special mention. They had refused to sacrifice, and, by order of their
general, were stripped naked and ordered to remain throughout a winter’s
night upon a frozen pond, exposed to the elements. At the side of the
pond was a building, where the water for the town baths was heated.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account