Constantine the Great: The reorganization of the Empire and the triumph of the ChurchFirth, John B. (John Benjamin)
History
Constantine the Great: The reorganization of the Empire and the triumph of the Church
Firth, John B. (John Benjamin)
Church history -- Primitive and early church, ca. 30-600; Constantine I, Emperor of Rome, -337
Shortly before the overthrow of Maxentius, one of Mensurius’s deacons
issued a defamatory libel against the Emperor and then took sanctuary at
Carthage. The Bishop refused to surrender him and was peremptorily
summoned to Rome. Evidently expecting that the Emperor would condemn him
and order the confiscation of the holy vessels of his church, Mensurius
secretly handed them over to the custody of certain elders in whose
honesty he thought he could place implicit reliance. But he took the
precaution—a wise one, as it subsequently proved—to make an inventory,
which he gave to an old woman, with instructions that if he did not
return she was to hand it to his lawfully appointed successor. Mensurius
then went to Rome, succeeded in convincing Maxentius of his innocence,
but died on the way home, in 311 A.D. As soon as the news of his death
reached Carthage, the round of intrigue began. According to Optatus, two
deacons named Botrus and Celestius, each hoping to secure his own
elevation, hurried on the election, in which the Numidian bishops were
not invited to take part. The passage is obscure, for Optatus goes on to
say that the choice fell upon Cæcilianus, who was elected “by the
suffrages of the whole people,” and was consecrated in due form by
Felix, Bishop of Aptunga. When Cæcilianus called upon the elders to
restore the Church ornaments, they quitted the Church—the suggestion of
the Catholic historian is that they had hoped to steal them—and attached
themselves to the faction of Lucilla, together with Botrus and
Celestius, whom St. Augustine roundly denounces as “impious and
sacrilegious thieves.” The schism was now complete. It had its origin,
says Optatus,[80] in the fury of a headstrong woman; it was nurtured by
intrigue and drew its strength from jealous greed.
-----
Footnote 80:
_Schisma igitur illo tempore confusæ mulieris iracundia peperit,
ambitus nutrivit, avaritia roboravit._
-----
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account