Constantine the Great: The reorganization of the Empire and the triumph of the ChurchFirth, John B. (John Benjamin)
History
Constantine the Great: The reorganization of the Empire and the triumph of the Church
Firth, John B. (John Benjamin)
Church history -- Primitive and early church, ca. 30-600; Constantine I, Emperor of Rome, -337
Then follows the Council of Arles in 314. With a forbearance rarely
displayed by a Roman emperor to inveterate and unreasoning opposition,
Constantine yielded to the clamour of the Donatists for a new council on
a broader and more authoritative scale than the commission of Italian
and Gallic bishops. But his disappointment and disgust are plainly to be
seen in his letter to the proconsul of Africa. Constantine began by
saying that he had fully expected that the decision of a commission of
bishops “of the very highest probity and competence” would have
commanded universal respect. He found, however, that the enemies of
Cæcilianus were as dogged and obstinate as ever, for they declared that
the bishops had simply shut themselves up in a room and judged the case
according to their personal predilections. They clamoured for another
council: he would grant them one which was to meet at Arles. Ælianus,
therefore, was to see that the public posting service throughout Africa
and Mauretania was placed at the disposal of Cæcilianus and his party
and of Donatus and his party, that they might travel with despatch and
cross into Spain by the quickest passage. Then the letter continued:
“You will provide each separate Bishop with imperial letters entitling
him to necessaries _en route_ (_tractorias litteras_) that he may
arrive at Arles by the first of August, and you will also give all the
bishops to understand that, before they leave their dioceses, they
must make arrangements whereby, during their absence, reasonable
discipline may be preserved and no chance revolt against authority or
private altercations arise, for these bring the Church into great
disgrace.
“On the other matters at issue, I wish the enquiry to be full and
complete, and an end to be reached,[82] as I hope it may be, when all
those who are known to be at variance meet together in person. The
quarrel may thus come to its natural and timely conclusion.
“For as I am well assured that you are a worshipper of the supreme
God, I confess to your Excellency that I consider it by no means
lawful for me to ignore disputes and quarrels of such a nature as may
excite the supreme Divinity to wrath, not only against the human race
but against myself personally, into whose charge the Divinity by its
Divine will has committed the governance of all that is on earth. In
its just indignation, it might decree some ill against me.
“And then only can I feel really and absolutely secure, and hope for
an unfailing supply of all the richest blessings that flow from the
instant goodness of Almighty God, when I shall see all mankind
reverencing most Holy God in brotherly singleness of worship and in
the lawful rites of our Catholic religion.”[83]
-----
Footnote 82:
_De cætero plena cognitione suscepta finis adhibeatur._
Footnote 83:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account