Constantine the Great: The reorganization of the Empire and the triumph of the ChurchFirth, John B. (John Benjamin)
History
Constantine the Great: The reorganization of the Empire and the triumph of the Church
Firth, John B. (John Benjamin)
Church history -- Primitive and early church, ca. 30-600; Constantine I, Emperor of Rome, -337
_Tunc enim revera et plenissime securus potero esse, cum universos
sensero debito cultu catholicæ religionis sanctissimum Deum concordi
observantiæ fraternitate venerari._
-----
Not only did Constantine write in this evidently sincere strain to the
proconsul of Africa; he also sent personal letters to the bishops whose
presence he desired. Eusebius has preserved the text of one of these,
which was addressed to Chrestus, Bishop of Syracuse, in which the
Emperor instructs him not to fail to reach Arles by August 1st, and bids
him secure a public vehicle from Latronianus, the Governor of Sicily,
and bring with him two presbyters of the second rank and three personal
servants. In obedience to Constantine’s wishes the bishops assembled at
Arles by the appointed day. It is not known how many were present. On
the fullest list of those who signed the canons there agreed to are
found the names of thirty-three bishops, thirteen presbyters,
twenty-three deacons, two readers, seven exorcists, and four
representatives of the Bishop of Rome. But from the extreme importance
attached to the council in later times it is certain that many more
attended, and the numbers have been variously estimated at from two to
six hundred. Not a single Eastern bishop was present. It was a council
of the West, representing the various provinces of Africa and Gaul,
Spain, Britain, Italy, Sicily, and Sardinia. From Britain came Eborius
of York, Restitutus of London, and Adelfius, the Bishop of a diocese
which has been variously interpreted as that of Colchester, Lincoln, and
Caerleon on Usk, with a presbyter named Sacerdos and a deacon called
Arminius. The Bishop of Rome, Sylvester, sent two presbyters and two
deacons.
The Council investigated with great minuteness the points raised by the
Donatists, but it is clear from the report sent to Sylvester that the
Donatists were no better supplied with evidence than they had been at
Rome. They simply repeated the old, unsubstantiated charge against
Cæcilianus that, as deacon, he had forcibly prevented the members of the
Church of Carthage from succouring their brethren in prison during the
persecution of Diocletian, and the disproved accusation against the
bishop who consecrated him that he had been a _traditor_. In a word,
they had absolutely no case and the Council of Arles endorsed the
verdict of the Council of Rome. The synodal letter to Sylvester began as
follows:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account