Constantine the Great: The reorganization of the Empire and the triumph of the ChurchFirth, John B. (John Benjamin)
History
Constantine the Great: The reorganization of the Empire and the triumph of the Church
Firth, John B. (John Benjamin)
Church history -- Primitive and early church, ca. 30-600; Constantine I, Emperor of Rome, -337
Constantine evidently shared the same conviction. He had no doubt
whatever that the Arian heresy was finally silenced. So we find him
writing to the church at Alexandria, declaring that all points which
seemed to be open to different interpretations have been thoroughly
discussed and settled. All must abide by the _chose jugée_. Arius had
been proved to be a servant of the Devil. Three hundred bishops had said
it, and “that which has commended itself to the judgment of three
hundred bishops cannot be other than the doctrine of God, seeing that
the Holy Spirit, dwelling in the minds of so many honourable men, must
have thoroughly enlightened them as to the will of God.”[104] He took
for granted, therefore, that, those who had been led away by Arius would
return at once to the Catholic fold. The Emperor also wrote another
letter, which he addressed “To the Churches,” in which he declared that
each question at issue had been discussed until a decision was arrived
at “acceptable to Him who is the inspector of all things,” and added
that nothing was henceforth left for dissension or controversy in
matters of faith.[105] Most of the letter, indeed, consists of argument
shewing the desirability of a uniform celebration of Easter, but one can
see that the leading thought in the writer’s mind is that the last word
had at length been uttered on the cardinal doctrines of the Christian
Faith. The Council had been a brilliant success. The three hundred
bishops announced to the Catholic Church the decisions of their “great
and holy Synod,” with the explicit declaration that “all heresy has been
cut out of the Church.”[106] Arius was banished and Eusebius of
Nicomedia with him. The triumph of orthodoxy seemed finally assured.
-----
Footnote 104:
ὅ γὰρ τοῖς τριακοσίοις ἐπισκόποις ἤρεσεν οὔδεν ἔστιν ἕτερον ἤ τοῦ θεοῦ
γνώμη (Soc., i., 9).
Footnote 105:
ὡς μηδὲν ἔτι πρὸς διχόνοιαν ἢ πίστεως αμφισβητησιν ὑπολείπεσθαι
(_ibidem_).
Footnote 106:
ἐπὶ τὸ πὰσαν αἵρεσιν ἐκκοπῆναι (Soc., i., 9).
-----
[Illustration]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Illustration]
CHAPTER XII
THE MURDERS OF CRISPUS AND FAUSTA
We saw in the last chapter how Constantine presided over the
deliberations of the bishops at Nicæa, mild, benignant, gracious, and
condescending. It is a very different being whom we see at Rome in 326,
suspicious, morose, and striking down in blind fury his own gallant son.
The contrast is startling, the cause obscure and mysterious, but if the
secret is to be discovered at all, it is probably to be found in the
jealousies which raged in the Imperial House.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account