Constantine the Great: The reorganization of the Empire and the triumph of the ChurchFirth, John B. (John Benjamin)
History
Constantine the Great: The reorganization of the Empire and the triumph of the Church
Firth, John B. (John Benjamin)
Church history -- Primitive and early church, ca. 30-600; Constantine I, Emperor of Rome, -337
After certain other bishops had met with a like fate, the Eusebii flew
at higher game and attacked Athanasius. They had already entered into an
understanding with the Meletian faction in Egypt, who carefully kept
alive the charges against Athanasius, and now they again took up the
cudgels on behalf of Arius. Eusebius wrote to the Patriarch asking him
to restore Arius to communion on the ground that he had been grievously
misrepresented. Athanasius bluntly refused. Arius, he said, had started
a deadly heresy: he had been anathematised by an Œcumenical Council:
how, then, could he be restored to communion? Eusebius and Arius
appealed to the Emperor. Constantine, who had previously ordered Arius
to attend at court and promised him signal proof of his regard and
permission to return to Alexandria, sent a peremptory message to
Athanasius bidding him admit Arius. When Athanasius, on the score of
conscience, returned a steady refusal, the Emperor angrily threatened
that, if he did not throw open his church doors to all who desired to
enter, he would send an officer to turn him out of his church and expel
him from Alexandria. “Now that you have full knowledge of my will,” he
added, “see that you provide uninterrupted entry to all who wish to
enter the church. If I hear that you have prevented any one from joining
the services, or have shut the doors in their faces, I will at once
despatch some one to deport you from Alexandria.” The threat did not
terrify Athanasius, who declared that there could be no fellowship
between heretics and true believers. Nor was the Imperial officer sent.
Then began an extraordinary campaign of calumny against the Patriarch,
who was accused of taxing Egypt in order to buy a supply of linen
garments, called “sticharia,” for his church; of instigating one
Macarius to upset a communion table and break a sacred chalice; of
murdering a Meletian bishop named Arsenius, who was presently found
alive and well; and of other crimes equally preposterous and unfounded.
It was the Meletian irreconcilables in Egypt who brought these calumnies
forward, but Athanasius had no doubt that the moving spirit was none
other than Eusebius himself. And his enemies, whoever they were, were
untiring and implacable. As soon as one calumny was refuted, they were
ready with another, and all this time there was Eusebius at the
Emperor’s side, continually suggesting that with so much smoke there
needs must be some fire, and that Athanasius ought to be called upon to
clear himself, lest the scandal should do injury to the Church.
Constantine summoned a council to try Athanasius in 333, and fixed the
place of meeting in Cæsarea,—a tolerably certain proof that the two
Eusebii were acting in concert. For some reason not stated the bishops
did not assemble until the following year, and then Athanasius refused
to attend. Not until 335 did Athanasius stand before his episcopal
judges at Tyre.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account